Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Maruo, Hajime
Affiliations: National University of Yokohama, Yokohama, Japan
Abstract: The horsepower of a ship predicted by a tank test is usually the value in a calm sea, but a considerable power should be added to this when a ship is steaming in a seaway. Though the increase of the resistance due to the waves encountered, has been recognized for a long time, there are different opinions as to the cause of the excess resistance. In 1939, Dr. Kreitner [1] suggested that the additional resistance is mainly due to the reflection of sea waves, but Sir Thomas H. Havelock [2] did not agree with him, showing the drifting force due to wave reflection to be very small. In 1942, Havelock [3] proposed a theory in which the additional resistance arose from the phase difference between the ship’s motion and the excitation of the wave. Some computations were carried out by Mr. M. St. Denis, according to Havelock’s theory [4]. From the theoretical point of view, however, this method is only an approximate or tentative one. Some years ago, Mr. Hanaoka [5] gave a theory of the wave resistance of a ship which is forced to oscillate, and he showed a considerable increase of the wave resistance due to forced heaving and pitching. He also applied the theory to the resistance experienced by a ship among waves making the approximation that the effect of the seaway was expressed by the wavy motion of the ship’s surface relative to still water [6]. The additional resistance obtained by Hanaoka is different from Havelock’s findings. There seem, then, to be at least two independent components in the additional resistance. Unfortunately, however, we have not found any reasonable connection between them, because Hanaoka’s theory was originally based upon the motion of a ship in still water instead of the actual seaway. The difficulty lies in the fact that the additional wave resistance appears in the higher order quantity which is usually omitted in the linearized theory, but if we examine carefully the terms which should be omitted and those which should be taken into account, we can still make use of the linearized theory in solving the problem of the excess resistance of a ship in rough seas. In this paper, the author will propose a general theory of the force experienced by a ship oscillating amongst waves, and then he will attempt a computation of the motion of a ship of simple shape in head seas, from which the resistance increase will be evaluated.
DOI: 10.3233/ISP-1957-43501
Journal: International Shipbuilding Progress, vol. 4, no. 35, pp. 337-345, 1957
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]