Affiliations: Laboratoire d'Etude des Interfaces et des Biofilms en Odontologie, EA637 Université Claude Bernard, Lyon I, Faculté d'Odontologie, rue Guillaume Paradin, 69372 Lyon cedex 08, France | Laboratoire des Matériaux Polymères et Biomatériaux, UMR CNRS 5627, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon I, Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1919, 69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France
Abstract: The aim of this study is to assess the influence of plasma lamps on the properties of the composites compared to the influence of conventional polymerization. Vickers hardness tests, three-point bending tests, and measurement of the shrinkage marginal gap by scanning electron microscopy were carried out on three resin composites (Tetric® Ceram, Z-100™ and Inten-S®) irradiated with to lamps (Flipo® plasma and Astralis® 7 halogen lamps). With a 3-second exposure, the results of Vickers hardness and resistance to flexion (excepting values for Z-100™) were lower for the composites cured by the Flipo® plasma lamp, than after 40-second curing by the conventional halogen lamp (Astralis® 7), notably at a depth of 3 mm. With a 5-second exposure the results of Vickers hardness and resistance to flexion obtained using the plasma lamp approached those obtained by using the halogen lamp. Whatever the polymerization protocol used, the measurements of the gap between the tooth and the filling are very similar except for Z-100™/Astralis® 7, for which shrinkage results are more important. For any one resin composite and lamp used, the shrinkage values obtained at a depth of 4 mm are twice higher than those obtained at the surface. In conclusion, for a 3-second exposure the level of polymerization obtained by plasma curing is lower than the one obtained by halogen curing, particularly in depth. On the other hand, 5-second plasma curing results recommends the use of this kind of lamp.
