Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Ursino, M. | Artioli, E.
Affiliations: Department of Electronics and Automatics, University of Ancona, via Brecce Bianche, 160131 Ancona, Italy | Department of Electronics, Computer Science and Systems, University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento 2, I 40136 Bologna, Italy
Abstract: The values of the propagation coefficient measured on a silicon rubber tube in the frequency range 1–15 Hz were compared, using four different equations. The first formula is based on three simultaneous pressure measurements performed at equidistant points; the remaining three equations are original, and make use of only two of the three pressure measurements together with a no-flow condition at the terminal tube section. The results of our trials demonstrate that the experimental phase velocity, obtained with all equations, settles at a value about 25% in excess of the theoretical one computed with a classic linear mathematical model. This result may be explained by an increase in the dynamical Young modulus with respect to that measured in static conditions. However, the three-point method introduces great errors in the results in the frequency range 11–14 Hz where the spectrum of the second signal becomes minimum. In all cases, the experimental value of attenuation per wavelength at mid-high frequencies is greater than the theoretical one valid for a purely elastic tube. The attenuation values obtained with the two-point method can be explained by introducing a small contribution of wall viscoelasticity (2–3°) into the linear model. Attenuation per wavelength computed with the three-point method turns out about threefold that computed with each of the two-point formulas. This result supports the idea that the accuracy of the three-point method may be insufficient to achieve correct estimation of wave attenuation, especially when the distance between transducers is small compared to wavelength.
Keywords: attenuation per wavelength, phase velocity, viscoelastic tubes, wave propagation
DOI: 10.3233/BME-1992-2307
Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 155-169, 1992
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]