You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Effects of distraction task on driving: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Issue title: Frontiers in Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology – Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, 25–28 September 2014, Beijing, China

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Chung, Soon-Cheol | Choi, Mi-Hyun | Kim, Hyung-Sik | You, Na-Rae | Hong, Sang-Pyo | Lee, Jung-Chul | Park, Sung-Jun | Baek, Ji-Hye | Jeong, Ul-Ho | You, Ji-Hye | Lim, Dae-Woon | Kim, Hyun-Jun;

Affiliations: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical & Health Science, Konkuk University, Chungju 380-701, South Korea | Department of Information & Communication Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 100-715, South Korea | Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Konkuk University, Chungju 380-701, South Korea

Note: [] Corresponding author: Hyun-Jun Kim, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Konkuk University, Chungju 380-701, South Korea. Tel.: +82-17-258-2192; Fax: +82-43-851-0620; E-mail: [email protected].

Keywords: Distraction, driving, fMRI, MR-compatible driving simulator

DOI: 10.3233/BME-141117

Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 2971-2977, 2014

Published: 2014
Get PDF open access

Abstract

This study investigated neuronal activation differences under two conditions: driving only and distracted driving. Driving and distraction tasks were performed using a Magnetic Resonance (MR)-compatible driving simulator with a driving wheel and pedal. The experiment consisted of three blocks, and each block had both a Rest phase (1 min) and a Driving phase (2 min). During the Rest phase, drivers were instructed to simply look at the stop screen without performing any driving tasks. During the Driving phase, each driver was required to drive at 110 km/h under two conditions: driving only and driving while performing additional distraction tasks. The results show that the precuneus, inferior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus, middle frontal gyrus, cuneus, and declive are less activated in distracted driving than in driving only. These regions are responsible for spatial perception, spatial attention, visual processing and motor control. However, the cingulate gyrus and sub-lobar regions (lentiform nucleus and caudate), which are responsible for error monitoring and control of unnecessary movement, show increased activation during distracted driving compared with driving only.

Show more