Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Medical Engineering and Therapy, Nancy 2006, 15–16 May
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Decot, V.; | Latger-Cannard, V. | Lecompte, T. | Clément, L. | Salmon, A. | Bordigoni, P. | Stoltz, J.-F.; | Bensoussan, D.
Affiliations: Cell Therapy Unit and Tissue Bank, CHU Nancy Brabois, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France | Nancy Université UHP, CNRS – Cell and Tissue Engineering, UMR 7563, Faculté de medecine, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France | Biological Department of Hematology, CHU Nancy Brabois, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France | Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Children Hospital, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France
Note: [] Address for correspondence: V. Decot, Cell Therapy Unit and Tissue Bank, CHU Nancy Brabois, allée du Morvan, 54511 Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France. Fax: +33 83154858.
Abstract: Chimerism analysis has become an important tool to manage patients in the peri-transplant period of allogenic stem cell transplantation. During this period, cells of donor and host origin can coexist and increasing proportion of cells of host origin is considered as a recurrence of the underlying disease. We currently performed chimerism analysis on separate peripheral blood cell subsets, lymphocytes and granulocytes. To improve our isolation method, a new automated device from Stem Cell Technology Robosep™ was tested and compared to our manual separation technique. The results obtained on T cell purification showed an improvement of the purity (98.42% with Robosep vs. 92.42% with the manual technique Rosettesep) and of the recovery (63.43% with Robosep and 38% with Rosettesep). The results were significantly improved on patient samples with less than 10% CD3 positive cells (purity: 90% vs. 44.44%; recovery: 73.79% vs. 43.98%). Granulocytes separation was based on CD15 expression. The results showed an improvement of the purity with Robosep (96.90% vs. 86.20% with the manual technique Polymorphprep) but the recovery was impaired (35.2% vs. 52.30%). Using a myeloid (CD66/CD33) cocktail, recovery was improved with the Robosep device (64.04% with the myeloid cocktail vs. 22.4% with the CD15 cocktail). Our data demonstrated that Robosep allowed a performant cell purification in the early period post-transplantation even for populations representing less than 10% of the peripheral blood cells.
Keywords: Chimerism, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, cell subset isolation
Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 18, no. s1, pp. 19-26, 2008
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]