Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Zieren, Jürgen | Neuss, Heiko | Paul, Marco | Müller, Joachim
Affiliations: Department of General‐, Visceral‐, Vascular‐ and Thoracic Surgery, Charité, Campus Mitte, Humboldt University Berlin, Schumannstraße 20/21, D‐10117 Berlin, Germany
Note: [] Corresponding author: Jürgen Zieren, MD, PhD Department of General‐, Visceral‐, Vascular‐ and Thoracic Surgery Charité, Campus Mitte, Humboldt University Berlin, Schumannstraße 20/21, D‐10117 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: +4930 / 450 522022; Fax: +4930 / 450 522905; E‐mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Background: Nowadays the surgical treatment of abdominal hernias includes the use of synthetic meshes in most cases. Due to chronic foreign body reactions, however, the most commonly used polypropylene meshes can lead to material hardening and recurrent hernias. As a proven cruciate ligament replacement polyethylene terephthalate (KoSa hochfest®) showed only little foreign body reactions and provided excellent clinical outcomes. In an animal trial it was therefore tested as mesh implant for hernia treatment and compared with Prolene®. Material and method: The study was carried out in 12 mini‐pigs. 10×10 cm of the musculofascial abdominal layer was resected, the peritoneum was preserved. A 15×15 cm synthetic mesh was implanted in sublay‐technique (either KoSa hochfest®, Telos GmbH, Marburg, Germany or Prolene®, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), mainly to test for chronic foreign body reactions. An independent pathologist tested the mesh size and foreign body reaction at 2 and 6 months, analysing the number of foreign body giant cells. Results: No significant differences in mesh size were observed, neither between the compared groups nor with respect to the time periods. Compared to KoSa hochfest® the foreign body reaction was significantly stronger in the Prolene® implants, both at 2 and at 6 months (number of foreign body giant cells at 2 months: Prolene®/KoSa hochfest®: 2.2±0.4/0.8±0.2, at 6 months: 4.6±1.3/1.1±0.5). In contrast to KoSa hochfest®, Prolene® still showed significant foreign body reactions at 6 months as well as calcifications of all samples. Conclusion: The animal trials revealed that due to its high biocompatibility and little foreign body reaction KoSa hochfest® is a promising implant for the treatment of hernias.
Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 127-132, 2004
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]