Affiliations: [a] Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| [b] Vascular Surgery Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Konstantinos Tzirakis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Estavromenos, 71410 Heraklion, Crete, Greece. Tel.: +30 2810 379215; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: PURPOSE:To compare the hemodynamic performance of three (Bottom Up non-ballet, Top-Down non-ballet, Top Down ballet) idealized stent graft configurations used during endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, under the influence of various rheological models. METHODS:Ten rheological models are assumed and a commercial finite volume solver is employed for the simulation of blood flow under realistic boundary conditions. An appropriate mesh convergence study is performed and five hemodynamic variables are computed: the time average wall shear stress (TAWSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), relative residence time (RRT), endothelial cell activation potential (ECAP) and displacement force (DF) for all three configurations. RESULTS:The choice of blood flow model may affect results, but does not constitute a significant determinant on the overall performance of the assumed stent grafts. On the contrary, stent graft geometry has a major effect. Specifically, the Bottom Up non-ballet type is characterized by the least favorable performance presenting the lowest TAWSS and the highest OSI, RRT and ECAP values. On the other hand, the Top Down ballet type presents hemodynamic advantages yielding the highest TAWSS and lowest OSI, RRT and ECAP average values. Furthermore, the ballet type is characterized by the lowest DF, although differences observed are small and their clinical relevance uncertain. CONCLUSIONS:The effect of the assumed rheological model on the overall performance of the grafts is not significant. It is thus relatively safe to claim that it is the type of stent graft that determines its overall performance rather than the adopted blood flow model.
