Cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery bypass grafting patients: Effect of eight weeks of moderate-intensity continuous training versus high-intensity interval training
Affiliations: [a] Department of Sport Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, The University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
| [b] Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
| [c] Faculty of Physical Education, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran; Kurdistan Education Office, Ministry of Education, Kurdistan, Iran; Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| [d] Department of Sport Physiology, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
| [e] Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, Senftenberg, Germany
| [f] Faculty of Sport Science, Shahid Rajaei Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Negin Kordi, Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. Tel.: +98 9106050540; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Physical training in patients with heart failure can affect hemodynamic, cardiac and angiogenesis parameters. OBJECTIVE:The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of traditional moderate-intensity rehabilitation training and interval training on some angiogenesis factors in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. METHODS:Thirty CABG patients (mean age±SD, 55±3 years) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: high-intensity interval training (HIIT) or moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) or the control group. After the initial assessments, eligible patients in the experimental groups (HIIT and MICT) performed exercise training for 8 weeks, while the control group did not. Angiogenesis and angiostatic indices, including pro-adrenomedullin (pro-ADM), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and endostatin, were then measured. RESULTS:The results showed no significant difference between pro-ADM in the HIIT and MICT groups (P = 0.99), but a significant difference was found between MICT and the control group and between HIIT and the control group (P = 0.001). There is also no significant difference between the bFGF levels in the HIIT and MICT training groups (P = 1.00), but the changes in this factor between the training groups and the control group were significant (P = 0.001). There was a significant difference between the levels of endostatin in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS:Two methods of cardiac rehabilitation (HIIT and MICT) may be useful for the recovery of patients with coronary artery bypass grafting. This improvement manifested itself in changes in angiogenesis and angiostatic indices in this study. However, more extensive studies are needed to investigate the effects of these two types of rehabilitation programs on other indicators of angiogenesis and angiostatic.
