Diagnostic value of Doppler imaging for malignant non-mass breast lesions: with different diagnostic criteria for older and younger women: first results
Affiliations: Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Xin Song Jiang Road, Shanghai, China
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Rong Wu, Department of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, 650 Xin Song Jiang Road, Song Jiang District, Shanghai, 201600, China. E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] First author.
Note: [2] Co-author.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To evaluate and optimize the additional diagnostic value of Doppler imaging for malignant NMLs detected by US. MATERIALS AND METHODS:The characteristics of 233 NMLs in Doppler imaging were analyzed, and different Adler grades of intralesional vessels were selected as the diagnostic cutoffs on Doppler imaging: grade 1 in the full cohort and in women < 40 years, and grade 0 in women ≥40 years. The diagnostic performance of US and US + Doppler imaging were calculated and compared with that of mammography. RESULTS:The AUC of US + Doppler was larger than that of US alone in each group (P < 0.001). In the full cohort, addition of Doppler imaging increased specificity of US, but decreased sensitivity. However, by use of different diagnostic cutoffs in the two subgroups, it was possible to achieve high sensitivity and specificity simultaneously, which were 100% and 75.8% in women < 40 years, 94.7% and 69.5% in women ≥40 years, respectively. The AUC + Doppler was comparable to that of mammography in the full cohort and in women ≥40 years. In women < 40 years, the AUC of the combination was larger than that of mammography (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION:Doppler imaging, with different Adler grades used as cutoffs in older versus younger women, can improve the specificity of US for the diagnosis of malignant NMLs without losing sensitivity. In younger women, US + Doppler imaging may be better than mammography.
