Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Yue, Wen-Wena; 1 | Wang, Shuoa; b; 1 | Xu, Hui-Xionga; c; * | Sun, Li-Pinga | Guo, Le-Hanga | Bo, Xiao-Wana | Li, Xiao-Longa | Zhao, Chong-Kea | Wang, Dana | Liu, Bo-Jia
Affiliations: [a] Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China | [b] Department of Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China | [c] State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramic and Superfine Microstructures, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Hui-Xiong Xu, MD, PhD, Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 301, Yanchangzhong Road, Shanghai 200072, China. Tel.: +86 18917683519; Fax: +86 021 66307539; E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] Wen-Wen Yue and Shuo Wang contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of parametric imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) from metastatic liver cancer(MLC). METHODS: 30 HCCs (mean diameter, 3.6±1.3 cm; range, 2.1–5.0 cm) and 30 MLCs (mean diameter, 2.8±1.5 cm; range, 1.2–5.0 cm) pathologically diagnosed or confirmed by clinical criteria that underwent CEUS were randomly included. CEUS was carried out using a multifrequency transducer (2–4 MHz) and a bolus injection of 2.4 mL SonoVue. The CEUS clips of the targeted lesion were recorded continuously for 6 minutes. By analyzing CEUS clips, parametric image could be obtained using the SonoLiver® software automatically. Quantitative parameters were compared between HCC and MLC groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was further performed on parameters with significant difference between two groups. RESULTS: On parametric imaging, the maximum intensity, rise time, time to peak, mean transit time and washout time for HCC and MLC were 185.6±148.0 vs. 95.2±58.6 (P = 0.003), 25.7±6.3 s vs. 23.8±8.8 s (P = 0.341), 30.7±7.9 s vs. 27.8±10.5 s (P = 0.246), 90.2±45.7 s vs. 89.3±40.3 s (P = 0.805), 63.4±29.5 s vs. 37.2±33.8 s (P = 0.005), respectively. ROC analysis was further performed for washout time and it showed a cut-off point of 43.765 s for the differentiation between HCC and MLC, with the AUC value of 0.780 (95% CI: 0.646–0.914). The corresponding diagnostic specificity, sensitivity and accuracy were 72.0%, 84.6% and 78.4% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Parametric imaging of CEUS can display perfusion effects of HCC and MLC objectively and visually and washout time may serve as a useful parameter on the differential diagnosis between HCC and MLC.
Keywords: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic liver cancer, parametric imaging, perfusion parameter
DOI: 10.3233/CH-162060
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 177-188, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]