Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Zimmermann, H.1 | Rübenthaler, J.1 | Rjosk-Dendorfer, D. | Helck, A. | Reimann, R. | Reiser, M. | Clevert, D.A.*
Affiliations: Institute for Clinical Radiology, Interdisciplinary ultrasound center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital Munich-Grosshadern, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author:Dirk André Clevert, MD, Professor of Radiology, Department of Clinical Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center, University of Munich –Grosshadern Campus, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany. Tel.: +49 89 44007 3620; Fax: +49 89 44007 8832; E-mail: [email protected].
Note: [1] Shared first-authorship.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the value of a portable ultrasound system and a high end ultrasound system in detection of endoleaks after EVAR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a cohort of 25 patients underwent both standard examination using a portable ultrasound system (Philips VISIQ) and a second examination using a high end ultrasound system (Philips EPIQ 7). The examination included B-mode and color Doppler in detection of endoleaks. Additional the maximum diameter of the aneurysm was measured in two planes (right-left and ventral-dorsal). The gold standard was contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in detection of endoleaks. RESULTS: 25 patients were included in the study. Patients were predominantly male (n = 23) with an average age of 73,30±7.82 years (range 54–85). Diameters of the treated aneurysms were in the right-left plane 5,32±1.88 cm and ventral-dorsal 4,99±1.78 cm using the high end system. Diameters of the treated aneurysms were in the right-left plane 5,30±1.82 cm and ventral-dorsal 4,87±1.74 cm using portable ultrasound system. In 80% of the cases CEUS could detect an endoleak. Whereas the high end system could detect in B-mode 40% and color Doppler 45% of the cases an endoleak. The portable system could detect in B-mode 30% and in color Doppler 35% of the cases an endoleak. On both systems in B-mode a false positive endoleak was found on the same patient. All high flow endoleaks, which needed intervention, could be detected on all systems. CONCLUSION: The high end ultrasound system does not seem to have an additional advantage in the measurement of the aneurysm diameter. Due to a higher resolution, more endoleaks could be detected in B-mode and color Doppler by using the high end system. The presence of small endoleaks could only be detected by using contrast enhanced ultrasound on an high end ultrasound system. High flow endoleaks could be reliable seen on both systems.
Keywords: Endoleak, EVAR, AAA, CEUS, portable ultrasound system
DOI: 10.3233/CH-152011
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 99-111, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]