Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Lerchbaumer, Markus Herberta; * | Fischer, Thomasa | Uluk, Denizb | Friedersdorff, Frankc | Hamm, Bernda | Spiesecke, Paula
Affiliations: [a] Department of Radiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany | [b] Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany | [c] Department of Urology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Markus H. Lerchbaumer, MD., Department of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Tel.: +49 30 450 657084; Fax: +49 30 450 7557901; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:B-Mode and Doppler ultrasound are standard diagnostic techniques for early postoperative monitoring and long-term follow-up of kidney transplants. In certain cases, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is used to clarify unclear Doppler findings. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the diagnostic performance of CEUS in the workup of renal allograft pathologies. METHODS:A systematic search for CEUS examinations of renal transplants conducted in our department between 2008 and 2020 was performed using the following inclusion criteria: i) patient age ≥18 years and ii) confirmation of diagnosis by biopsy and histopathology, imaging follow-up by CEUS, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (ceCT), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (ceMRI), or angiography, or intraoperative findings. Exclusion criteria were: i) CEUS performed in the setting of a study and ii) CEUS for other indications than dedicated renal transplant examination. Statistical analysis was performed separately for subgroups with different indications (focal vs non-focal). RESULTS:Overall, 78 patients were included in the statistical analysis, which revealed high sensitivity (92.2%, 95% -confidence interval [CI] 81.5–96.9%) and high specificity (88.9%, 95% -CI 71.9–96.1%) of CEUS. CONCLUSIONS:The high diagnostic performance demonstrated here and the superficial location of kidney allografts advocate the additional use of CEUS in the follow-up of renal transplant recipients.
Keywords: Renal ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, CEUS, sensitivity, specificity, renal transplant
DOI: 10.3233/CH-211357
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 75-83, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]