Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Selected Presentations held at the 33th Annual Conference of the German Society for Clinical Microcirculation and Hemorheology, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany, 14-15 November, 2014
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Weinrich, M. | Schindler, P. | Kundt, G. | Klar, E. | Bünger, C.M.;
Affiliations: Department of General, Thoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany | Institute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany | Department of Vascular Medicine, Vivantes Humboldt-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
Note: [] Corresponding author: Malte Weinrich, Department of General, Thoracic, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany. Tel.: +49 381 494 6001; Fax: +49 381 494 6002; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: BACKGROUND: For the reduction of cardio- and cerebrovascular events in carotid endarterectomies continuation of antiplatelet medication is recommended perioperatively. As a result, this patient population is at increased risk for postoperative bleeding complications. Intraoperative application of local hemostatic agents might reduce the incidence of bleeding complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 565 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy between January 2005 and January 2011 were analysed retrospectively. Most patients in the earlier cohort years of the study had no perioperative antiplatelet medication. In contrast antiplatelet medication was usually continued perioperatively in the later cohort years. To reduce the risk of perioperative bleeding local hemostatic agents were applied increasingly. RESULTS: Revision surgery, due to postoperative bleeding or massive hematoma, was necessary in 20 cases (3.5 %). Overall, 383 carotid endarterectomies (67.8 %) were performed with perioperative antiplatelet medication. Local hemostatic agents were applied in 259 cases (45.8 %) intraoperatively. Initially, operations performed in patients taking antiplatelet medication resulted in an increased need for surgical revision. Following an accelerated practice of using local hemostatic agents, the need for revision surgeries fell. Nevertheless, when patients from all years were analysed together there was no significant benefit from the application of local hemostatic agents. CONCLUSION: Application of local hemostatic agents might have contributed to a reduction of bleeding complications in carotid endarterectomies. However, this could not be shown of statistical significance. Other confounding factors such as different operative techniques or forms of anesthesia might also have influenced this decline.
Keywords: Hemostatic agents, carotid endarterectomy, antiplatelet medication, bleeding complication
DOI: 10.3233/CH-141901
Journal: Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 271-279, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]