Affiliations: [a] Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| [b] Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham Research Laboratories, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| [c]
National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| [d] School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| [e] Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University of Birmingham, UK
| [f] Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Dr. David N. Naumann, Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Tel.: +44 7861 242 807; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Preclinical studies report that higher plasma viscosity improves microcirculatory flow after haemorrhagic shock and resuscitation, but no clinical study has tested this hypothesis. OBJECTIVE:We investigated the relationship between plasma viscosity and sublingual microcirculatory flow in patients during resuscitation for traumatic haemorrhagic shock (THS). METHODS:Sublingual video-microscopy was performed for 20 trauma patients with THS as soon as feasible in hospital, and then at 24 h and 48 h. Values were obtained for total vessel density, perfused vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, microcirculatory flow index (MFI), microcirculatory heterogeneity index (MHI), and Point of Care Microcirculation (POEM) scores. Plasma viscosity was measured using a Wells-Brookfield cone and plate micro-viscometer. Logistic regression analyses examined relationships between microcirculatory parameters and plasma viscosity, adjusting for covariates (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, haematocrit, rate and volume of fluids, and rate of noradrenaline). RESULTS:Higher plasma viscosity was not associated with improved microcirculatory parameters. Instead, there were weakly significant associations between higher plasma viscosity and lower (poorer) MFI (p = 0.040), higher (worse) MHI (p = 0.033), and lower (worse) POEM scores (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS:The current study did not confirm the hypothesis that higher plasma viscosity improves microcirculatory flow dynamics in patients with THS. Further clinical investigations are warranted to determine whether viscosity is a physical parameter of importance during resuscitation of these patients.
