Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Purchase individual online access for 1 year to this journal.
Price: EUR 410.00Impact Factor 2024: 0.4
Fundamenta Informaticae is an international journal publishing original research results in all areas of theoretical computer science. Papers are encouraged contributing:
- solutions by mathematical methods of problems emerging in computer science
- solutions of mathematical problems inspired by computer science.
Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to): theory of computing, complexity theory, algorithms and data structures, computational aspects of combinatorics and graph theory, programming language theory, theoretical aspects of programming languages, computer-aided verification, computer science logic, database theory, logic programming, automated deduction, formal languages and automata theory, concurrency and distributed computing, cryptography and security, theoretical issues in artificial intelligence, machine learning, pattern recognition, algorithmic game theory, bioinformatics and computational biology, quantum computing, probabilistic methods, & algebraic and categorical methods.
Authors: Della Monica, Dario | Murano, Aniello | Sauro, Luigi
Article Type: Other
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1971
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 176, no. 3-4, pp. i-ii, 2020
Authors: Su, Ezgi Iraz
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: This paper presents a general strategy, bringing together some major types of nonmonotonic reasoning under a monotonic bimodal setting. Such formalisms are also of interest to the fields of knowledge representation and declarative programming. We exemplify the methodology, capturing minimal model reasoning that underlies nonmonotonicity over S4F first, but then we also show how to apply the technique to other nonmonotonic logics respectively based on the modal logics KD45 and SW5 . We naturally succeed it, by modifying only the axioms of the underlying modal logic and show that it successfully works. The last two formalisms are also …known as autoepistemic logic (AEL ) and its reflexive extension (R AEL ) in the given order: AEL is an important form of nonmonotonic reasoning, introduced by Robert C. Moore in order to allow an agent to reason about his own knowledge. Equilibrium logic (EL ) is a general-purpose nonmonotonic reasoning formalism, proposed more recently by David Pearce as a semantical framework for answer set programming (ASP ). The latter is an efficient declarative problem solving approach with lots of applications to science and technology. Fariñas et al. have embedded EL (and so ASP ) into a monotonic bimodal logic. We take this work as an initiative and successfully apply a similar methodology to closely aligned nonmonotonic modal logics. We finally discuss the potential capability to subsume the epistemic extensions of ASP within our unified paradigm. Show more
Keywords: nonmonotonic reasoning, minimal model semantics, (autoepistemic) equilibrium logic, answer set programming, epistemic specifications, monotonic modal logic, Kripke model
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1972
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 176, no. 3-4, pp. 205-234, 2020
Authors: Giordano, Laura | Gliozzi, Valentina
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Reasoning about exceptions in ontologies is nowadays one of the challenges the description logics community is facing. The paper describes a preferential approach for dealing with exceptions in Description Logics, based on the rational closure. The rational closure has the merit of providing a simple and efficient approach for reasoning with exceptions, but it does not allow independent handling of the inheritance of different defeasible properties of concepts. In this work we outline a possible solution to this problem by introducing a weaker variant of the lexicographical closure, that we call skeptical closure , which requires to construct a single …base. We develop a bi-preference semantics for defining a characterization of the skeptical closure. Show more
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1973
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 176, no. 3-4, pp. 235-269, 2020
Authors: Alviano, Mario | Dodaro, Carmine
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Many efficient algorithms for the computation of optimum stable models in the context of Answer Set Programming (ASP) are based on unsatisfiable core analysis. Among them, algorithm OLL was the first introduced in the context of ASP, whereas algorithms ONE and PMRES were first introduced for solving the Maximum Satisfiability problem (MaxSAT) and later on adapted to ASP. In this paper, we present the porting to ASP of another state-of-the-art algorithm introduced for MaxSAT, namely K , which generalizes ONE and PMRES . Moreover, we present a new algorithm called OLL-IN-ONE that compactly encodes all aggregates …of OLL by taking advantage of shared aggregate sets propagators. The performance of the algorithms have been empirically compared on instances taken from the latest ASP Competition. Show more
Keywords: Answer Set Programming, weak constraints, unsatisfiable core analysis
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1974
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 176, no. 3-4, pp. 271-297, 2020
Authors: Tarzariol, Alice | Zanazzo, Eugenia | Dovier, Agostino | Policriti, Alberto
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: The main goal of this work is to propose a tool-chain capable of analyzing a data collection of temporally qualified (genetic) mutation profiles, i.e., a collection of DNA-sequences (genes) that present variations with respect to their “healthy” versions. We implemented a system consisting of a front-end, a reasoning core, and a post-processor: the first transforms the input data retrieved from medical databases into a set of logical facts, while the last displays the computation results as graphs. Concerning the reasoning core, we employed the Answer Set Programming paradigm, which is capable of deducing complex information from data. However, since the …system is modular, this component can be replaced by any logic programming tool for different kinds of data analysis. Indeed, we tested the use of a probabilistic inductive logic programming core. Show more
Keywords: Bioinformatics, Big Data Analysis, ASP
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1975
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 176, no. 3-4, pp. 299-319, 2020
Authors: Alberti, Marco | Gavanelli, Marco | Lamma, Evelina | Riguzzi, Fabrizio | Satoh, Ken | Zese, Riccardo
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Abductive Logic Programming (ALP) has been proven very effective for formalizing societies of agents, commitments and norms, in particular by mapping the most common deontic operators (obligation, prohibition, permission) to abductive expectations. In our previous works, we have shown that ALP is a suitable framework for representing norms. Normative reasoning and query answering were accommodated by the same abductive proof procedure, named 𝒮 CIFF. In this work, we introduce a defeasible flavour in this framework, in order to possibly discharge obligations in some scenarios. Abductive expectations can also be qualified as dischargeable, in the new, extended syntax. Both …declarative and operational semantics are improved accordingly, and proof of soundness is given under syntax allowedness conditions Moreover, the dischargement itself might be proved invalid, or incoherent with the rules, due to new knowledge provided later on. In such a case, a discharged expectation might be reinstated and hold again after some evidence is given. We extend the notion of dischargement to take into consideration also the reinstatement of expectations. The expressiveness and power of the extended framework, named 𝒮 CIFF𝒟 , is shown by modeling and reasoning upon a fragment of the Japanese Civil Code. In particular, we consider a case study concerning manifestations of intention and their rescission (Section II of the Japanese Civil Code). Show more
Keywords: Normative reasoning, Abductive Logic Programming, Constraint Logic Programming, Dischargement of expectations
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1976
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 176, no. 3-4, pp. 321-348, 2020
Authors: Cantone, Domenico | Nicolosi-Asmundo, Marianna | Santamaria, Daniele Francesco
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: In this paper we consider the most common TBox and ABox reasoning services for the description logic 𝒟ℒ〈4LQSR,x 〉(D) (𝒟 ℒ D 4 , × , for short) and prove their decidability via a reduction to the satisfiability problem for the set-theoretic fragment 4LQSR . 𝒟 ℒ D 4 , × is a very expressive description logic. It combines the high scalability and efficiency of rule languages such as the SemanticWeb Rule Language (SWRL) with the expressivity of description logics. In fact, among other features, it supports Boolean operations …on concepts and roles, role constructs such as the product of concepts and role chains on the left-hand side of inclusion axioms, role properties such as transitivity, symmetry, reflexivity, and irreflexivity, and data types. We further provide a KE-tableau-based procedure that allows one to reason on the main TBox and ABox reasoning tasks for the description logic 𝒟 ℒ D 4 , × . Our algorithm is based on a variant of the KE-tableau system for sets of universally quantified clauses, where the KE-elimination rule is generalized in such a way as to incorporate the γ-rule. The novel system, called KEγ -tableau, turns out to be an improvement of the system introduced in [1] and of standard first-order KE-tableaux [2]. Suitable benchmark test sets executed on C++ implementations of the three mentioned systems show that in several cases the performances of the KEγ -tableau-based reasoner are up to about 400% better than the ones of the other two systems. Show more
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1977
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 176, no. 3-4, pp. 349-384, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]