Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Computing Patterns in Strings
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Crochemore, Maxime; | Iliopoulos, Costas S.; | Lecroq, Thierry | Pinzon, Yoan J. | Plandowski, Wojciech | Rytter, Wojciech;
Affiliations: Institut Gaspard Monge, Université Marne-la-Vallée, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée CEDEX 2, France | Dept. of Computer Science, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK | School of Computing, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box 1987 U, WA, Australia | LIFAR-ABISS, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université de Rouen, 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan CEDEX, France | Instytut Informatyki, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Banacha 2, 02-097, Warszawa, Poland | Dept. of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA
Abstract: We consider a version of pattern matching useful in processing large musical data: δ-matching, which consists in finding matches which are δ-approximate in the sense of the distance measured as maximum difference between symbols. The alphabet is an interval of integers, and the distance between two symbols a, b is measured as |a-b|. We also consider (δ, γ)-matching, where γ is a bound on the total sum of the differences. We first consider "occurrence heuristics" by adapting exact string matching algorithms to the two notions of approximate string matching. The resulting algorithms are efficient in practice. Then we consider "substring heuristics". We present δ-matching algorithms fast on the average providing that the pattern is "non-flat" and the alphabet interval is large. The pattern is "flat" if its structure does not vary substantially. The algorithms, named δ-BM1, δ-BM2 and δ-BM3 can be thought as members of the generalized Boyer-Moore family of algorithms. The algorithms are fast on average. This is the first paper on the subject, previously only "occurrence heuristics" have been considered. Our substring heuristics are much stronger and refer to larger parts of texts (not only to single positions). We use δ-versions of suffix tries and subword graphs. Surprisingly, in the context of δ-matching subword graphs appear to be superior compared with compact suffix trees.
Keywords: String algorithms, approximate string matching, dynamic programming, computer-assisted music analysis
Journal: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 1-21, 2003
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]