Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Martín-Vide, Carlos
Affiliations: Research Group on Mathematical Linguistics and Language Engineering (GRLMC), Rovira i Virgili University, Pl. Imperial Tàrraco, 1, 43005 Tarragona, Spain. [email protected]
Abstract: Computation not only takes place in provoked contexts of scientific experimentation, but in natural circumstances too. We are going to approach computation in natural contexts. How the nature computes? Turing machines and Chomsky grammars are rewriting systems, and the same is true for Post, Thue, Markov, Lindenmayer and other classes of axiomatic systems. If, among the whole set of natural objects, we focus natural language description, we must say that major trends in contemporary linguistics look at syntax as a rewriting process. Is rewriting unavoidable in this case, does our mind work by rewriting, does the nature compute in this way? We shall attempt to defend that the answer could be negative. The arguments will come from computability theory as well as from linguistics. First we'll formally explain the former ones, then informally the latter ones. With regard to computability theory arguments, we will see that, using the operation of adjoining, a large generative capacity is obtained. This is the case with contextual grammars. It has recently been proved that each recursively enumerable language is the quotient by a regular language of a language generated by a contextual grammar of a particular form. Thus, adjoining (paste) and quotient (cut) lead to computational universality. Recursively enumerable languages can also be characterized as the quotient by a regular language of a language generated by an insertion grammar. The same result is obtained if we take the splicing operation, a formal model of the DNA recombination. This is again a cut-and-paste operation. On the basis of the proof of this result, several further characterizations of recursively enumerable languages have been obtained. Computability theory, then, could be reconstructed without rewriting (and non-terminal symbols) and without any loss in power. Our first aim will be to show some formal aspects of such reconstruction. Later, we'll try to obtain some consequences for the future development of generative theory of natural language.
Keywords: Mathematical Linguistics, Formal Language Theory, Theory of Computation
DOI: 10.3233/FI-1997-31202
Journal: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 117-124, 1997
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]