Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems
Guest editors: Qingliang Chen, Paolo Torroni and Serena Villata
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Ihara, Takamasaa; * | Tsuruta, Shunsukea | Todo, Taikib | Sakurai, Yukob | Yokoo, Makotob
Affiliations: [a] Graduate School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0375, Japan. {ihara, tsuruta}@agent.inf.kyushu-u.ac.jp | [b] Faculty of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0375, Japan. {todo, ysakurai, yokoo}@inf.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Graduate School of Information Science and Electrical Engineering, Kyushu University, Motooka 744, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka, 819-0375, Japan
Abstract: The cake cutting problem is concerned with the fair allocation of a divisible good among agents whose preferences vary over it. Recently, designing strategy-proof cake cutting mechanisms has caught considerable attention from AI and MAS researchers. Previous works assumed that an agent’s utility function is additive so that theoretical analysis becomes tractable. However, in practice, agents have non-additive utility over a resource. In this paper, we consider the all-or-nothing utility function as a representative example of non-additive utility because it can widely cover agents’ preferences for such real-world resources as the usage of meeting rooms, time slots for computational resources, bandwidth usage, and so on. We first show the incompatibility between envy-freeness and Pareto efficiency when each agent has all-or-nothing utility. We next propose two strategy-proof mechanisms that satisfy Pareto efficiency, which are based on the serial dictatorship mechanism, at the sacrifice of envy-freeness. To address computational feasibility, we propose a heuristic-based allocation algorithm to find a near-optimal allocation in time polynomial in the number of agents, since the problem of finding a Pareto efficient allocation is NP-hard. As another approach that abandons Pareto efficiency, we develop an envy-free mechanism and show that one of our serial dictatorship based mechanisms satisfies proportionality in expectation, which is a weaker definition of proportionality. Finally, we evaluate the efficiency obtained by our proposed mechanisms by computational experiments.
Keywords: Mechanism design, Cake cutting, Strategy-proofness, Non-additive preference
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2018-1641
Journal: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 158, no. 1-3, pp. 41-61, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]