Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Faber, Wolfgang | Leone, Nicola | Maratea, Marco | Ricca, Francesco
Affiliations: Department of Mathematics, University of Calabria, Italy. [email protected] | Department of Mathematics, University of Calabria, Italy. [email protected] | DIST, University of Genova, Italy. [email protected] | Department of Mathematics, University of Calabria, Italy. [email protected]
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Dep. of Math., University of Calabria Via P. Bucci, cubo 30b, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy
Note: [] Also works: Department of Mathematics, University of Calabria, Italy
Abstract: The introduction of aggregates has been one of the most relevant language extensions to Answer Set Programming (ASP). Aggregates are very expressive, they allow to represent many problems in a more succinct and elegant way compared to aggregate-free programs. A significant amount of research work has been devoted to aggregates in the ASP community in the last years, and relevant research results on ASP with aggregates have been published, on both theoretical and practical sides. The high expressiveness of aggregates (eliminating aggregates often causes a quadratic blow-up in program size) requires suitable evaluation methods and optimization techniques for an efficient implementation. Nevertheless, in spite of the above-mentioned research developments, aggregates are treated in a quite straightforward way in most ASP systems. In this paper, we explore the exploitation of look-back techniques for an efficient implementation of aggregates. We define a reason calculus for backjumping in ASP programs with aggregates. Furthermore, we describe how these reasons can be used in order to guide look-back heuristics for programs with aggregates. We have implemented both the new reason calculus and the proposed heuristics in the DLV system, and have carried out an experimental analysis on publicly available benchmarks which shows significant performance benefits.
Keywords: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming, Heuristics, Aggregates
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2011-408
Journal: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 379-413, 2011
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]