Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Purchase individual online access for 1 year to this journal.
Price: EUR 410.00Impact Factor 2024: 0.4
Fundamenta Informaticae is an international journal publishing original research results in all areas of theoretical computer science. Papers are encouraged contributing:
- solutions by mathematical methods of problems emerging in computer science
- solutions of mathematical problems inspired by computer science.
Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to): theory of computing, complexity theory, algorithms and data structures, computational aspects of combinatorics and graph theory, programming language theory, theoretical aspects of programming languages, computer-aided verification, computer science logic, database theory, logic programming, automated deduction, formal languages and automata theory, concurrency and distributed computing, cryptography and security, theoretical issues in artificial intelligence, machine learning, pattern recognition, algorithmic game theory, bioinformatics and computational biology, quantum computing, probabilistic methods, & algebraic and categorical methods.
Authors: Fioravanti, Fabio | Gallagher, John P. | Proietti, Maurizio
Article Type: Other
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1923
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. i-ii, 2020
Authors: Frühwirth, Thom
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: We present a concise source-to-source transformation that introduces justifications for user-defined constraints into the rule-based Constraint Handling Rules (CHR) programming language. There is no need to introduce a new semantics for justifications. This leads to a conservative extension of the language, as we can show the equivalence of rule applications. A scheme of two rules suffices to allow for logical retraction (deletion, removal) of CHR constraints during computation. Without the need to recompute from scratch, these rules remove the constraint and also undo all its consequences. We prove a confluence result concerning the rule scheme. We prove its correctness …in general and tighten the results for confluent programs. We give an implementation, show its correctness, present two classical examples of dynamic algorithms, and improve the implementation. The computational overhead of introducing justifications and of performing logical retraction, i.e. the additional time and space needed, is proportional to the derivation length in the original program. This overhead may increase space complexity, but does not change the worst-case time complexity. Show more
Keywords: Truth Maintenance, Rule-Based Programming, Logic Programming, Computational Logic, Source-to-Source Program Transformation, Constraint Deletion, Confluence
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1924
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. 253-283, 2020
Authors: Hanus, Michael
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Static type systems are usually not sufficient to express all requirements on function calls. Hence, contracts with pre- and postconditions can be used to express more complex constraints on operations. Contracts can be checked at run time to ensure that operations are only invoked with reasonable arguments and return intended results. Although such dynamic contract checking provides more reliable program execution, it requires execution time and could lead to program crashes that might be detected with more advanced methods at compile time. To improve this situation for declarative languages, we present an approach to combine static and dynamic contract checking …for the functional logic language Curry. Based on a formal model of contract checking for functional logic programming, we propose an automatic method to verify contracts at compile time. If a contract is successfully verified, it can be omitted from dynamic checking. This method decreases execution time without degrading reliable program execution. In the best case, when all contracts are statically verified, it provides trust in the software since crashes due to contract violations cannot occur during program execution. Show more
Keywords: Declarative programming, contracts, verification
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1925
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. 285-314, 2020
Authors: Skeirik, Stephen | Stefanescu, Andrei | Meseguer, José
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Reachability logic has been applied to 𝕂 rewrite-rule-based language definitions as a language-generic logic of programs to verify a wide range of sophisticated programs in conventional languages. Here we study how reachability logic can be made not just language-generic, but also rewrite-theory-generic , so that we can verify both conventional programs based on their rewriting logic operational semantics and distributed system designs specified as rewrite theories. A theory-generic reachability logic is presented and proved sound for a wide class of rewrite theories. Particular attention is given to increasing the logic’s automation by means of constructor-based semantic …unification, matching, narrowing, and satisfiability procedures. The relationships to Hoare logic and LTL are discussed, new methods for proving invariants of possibly never terminating distributed systems are developed, and experiments with a prototype implementation illustrating the new methods are presented. Show more
Keywords: reachability and rewriting logics, deductive verification
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2020-1926
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 173, no. 4, pp. 315-382, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]