Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Purchase individual online access for 1 year to this journal.
Price: EUR 410.00Impact Factor 2024: 0.4
Fundamenta Informaticae is an international journal publishing original research results in all areas of theoretical computer science. Papers are encouraged contributing:
- solutions by mathematical methods of problems emerging in computer science
- solutions of mathematical problems inspired by computer science.
Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to): theory of computing, complexity theory, algorithms and data structures, computational aspects of combinatorics and graph theory, programming language theory, theoretical aspects of programming languages, computer-aided verification, computer science logic, database theory, logic programming, automated deduction, formal languages and automata theory, concurrency and distributed computing, cryptography and security, theoretical issues in artificial intelligence, machine learning, pattern recognition, algorithmic game theory, bioinformatics and computational biology, quantum computing, probabilistic methods, & algebraic and categorical methods.
Authors: Hou, Fujun
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: Pairwise comparisons (PC) method is an efficient technique and hierarchical analysis is a popular means coping with complex decision problems. Based on two proposed theorems, this paper shows that the PC-based hierarchical decision models stem from the weighted average methods (including the arithmetic form and the geometric form). Some issues (including the rank reversal, the criterion for acceptable consistency and the method for deriving priorities, etc) associated with the current PC-based hierarchical models (including the AHP, the multiplicative AHP and the FPR-AHP) are investigated. Another PC-based hierarchical decision model, which is different from the Saaty’s AHP, is introduced for applications …by virtue of its desirable traits (such as the rank preservation, the isomorphic correspondence, etc). Show more
Keywords: hierarchical decision model, weighted average method, pairwise comparisons matrix (PCM), fuzzy preference relations (FPR), isomorphic correspondence
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2016-1339
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 144, no. 3-4, pp. 333-348, 2016
Authors: Huang, Han-Chen | Yang, Xiaojun
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is the most popular extension to the pairwise comparisons method which is based on the observation that it is much easier to rank several objects when restricted to two objects at one time. As the pairwise comparisons are subjective, the use of linguistic expressions rather than numerical values is straightforward and friendlier due to the uncertainties that are inherent in human judgments. In this paper, to handle the uncertainty and hesitancy in practical decisionmaking situations, we represent pairwise comparisons in AHP using hesitant cloud linguistic term sets (HCLTSs) which are proposed based on hesitant fuzzy …linguistic term sets (HFLTSs) and normal cloud models. Then, the synthetic cloud model aggregation algorithm is proposed to transform the HCLTS pairwise comparison matrix into the positive reciprocal synthetic cloud matrix. A prioritization method using the geometric mean technique is adopted, and the ranking method based on comparing of the parameters of normal cloud models is proposed. Thus, we extend the traditional AHP method in hesitant and uncertain environment, and we call it HCLTS-AHP method. The comparative linguistic expressions of preferences become more flexible and richer and are more similar to human beings’ cognitive models. Furthermore, the synthetic cloud model is consistent with objectivity and the calculations are easy to implement. An illustrated example is applied to the ranking of four alternatives to show the usefulness of the proposed HCLTS-AHP method. Show more
Keywords: Pairwise comparison, Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Normal cloud model, Hesitant cloud linguistic term set, Synthetic cloud model aggregation algorithm
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2016-1340
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 144, no. 3-4, pp. 349-362, 2016
Authors: Park, Jin Han | Kim, Ji Yu | Kwun, Young Chel
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: The geometric Bonferroni mean (GBM) is an important aggregation technique which reflects the correlations of aggregated arguments. Based on the GBM, in this paper, we develop the optimized weighted geometric Bonferroni mean (OWGBM) and the generalized optimized weighted geometric Bonferroni mean (GOWGBM), whose characteristics are to reflect the preference and interrelationship of the aggregated arguments. Furthermore, we develop the intuitionistic fuzzy optimized weighted geometric Bonferroni mean (IFOWGBM) and the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy optimized weighted geometric Bonferroni mean (GIFOWGBM), and study their desirable properties such as idempotency, commutativity, monotonicity and boundedness. Finally, based on the IFOWGBM and GIFOWGBM, we present an …approach to multi-criteria decision making and illustrate it with a practical example. Show more
Keywords: Intuitionistic fuzzy optimized weighted geometric Bonferroni mean (IFOWGBM), generalized intuitionistic fuzzy optimized weighted geometric Bonferroni mean (GIFOWGBM), multi-criteria decision making
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2016-1341
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 144, no. 3-4, pp. 363-381, 2016
Authors: Blagojevic, Bosko | Srdjevic, Bojan | Srdjevic, Zorica | Zoranovic, Tihomir
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: In AHP group decision making it is desirable that decision makers achieve the highest degree of consensus concerning the group priority vector at both levels, local and the final. Based on this philosophy, we have developed a method to derive local group priority vector respecting the three group consistency measures: geometric cardinal consensus index (GCCI ), group minimum violation coefficient (GMV ) and ordinal consensus measure (OCM ). Consistency of individual decisions against the group decision serves as an input to determine the weights of decision makers participating in the group and generate the group local priority vector. Proposed method …rewards cooperation between members of the group and raises chances for their consensus. Show more
Keywords: AHP group decision making, weights of decision makers, group consistency measures
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2016-1342
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 144, no. 3-4, pp. 383-395, 2016
Authors: Farkas, András
Article Type: Research Article
Abstract: We discuss the development and use of a recursive rank-one residue iteration (triple R-I) to balancing pairwise comparison matrices (PCMs). This class of positive matrices is in the center of interest of a widely used multi-criteria decision making method called analytic hierarchy process (AHP). To find a series of the ‘best’ transitive matrix approximations to the original PCM the Newton-Kantorovich (N-K) method is employed for the solution to the formulated nonlinear problem. Applying a useful choice for the update in the iteration, we show that the matrix balancing problem can be transformed to minimizing the Frobenius norm. Convergence proofs for …this scaling algorithm are given. A comprehensive numerical example is included to illustrate the useful features to measuring and reducing perturbation errors and inconsistency of a PCM as a result of the respondents’ judgments on the pairwise comparisons. Show more
Keywords: numerical mathematics, matrix balancing, diagonal similarity scaling, pairwise comparison matrix
DOI: 10.3233/FI-2016-1343
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 144, no. 3-4, pp. 397-417, 2016
Article Type: Other
Citation: Fundamenta Informaticae, vol. 144, no. 3-4, pp. 419-420, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]