Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Subtitle: Qualitative Assessment of Patients' Preferences and Providers' Attitudes about Patient-Provider Communication: A Focus Group Study
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Gramm, Lukas | Kosiol, Desiree | Opitz, Ursula | Farin, Erik
Affiliations: Abteilung Qualitätsmanagement und Sozialmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg.
Note: [] Korrespondenzadresse: Dipl. Psych. Lukas Gramm, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg i. Br., Abt. Qualitätsmanagement und Sozialmedizin, Engelbergerstraße 21, D-79106 Freiburg. Tel.: 0761 270 7428, Fax: 0761 270 7331, E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Objectives: Successful patient-provider communication is characterized by a high level of congruence between the patient's communication preferences and the provider's interaction style and is associated with better treatment results. In this study, a qualitative approach was used to identify relevant aspects of successful patient-provider communication from the patients' as well as the providers' viewpoints. (1) What expectations do patients have of communication with different providers? (2) Are there differences among the preferences of patients with varying clinical indications and (3) how great is congruence with the providers¡¯ attitudes about communication? Methods: 57 patients (30 with chronic back pain and 27 with chronic ischemic heart disease) and 50 providers (17 physicians, 11 nurses, and 22 therapists) were questioned about relevant aspects of patient-provider communication. The recorded focus groups were transcribed and subjected to a qualitative content analysis in a multi-stage process using the ATLAS.ti software. Results: A total of 38 categories of patient preferences were identified which showed both indication-specific and provider-specific communication preferences. The most frequently named patient preferences were related to "providing information", answering "patients' questions", and "taking enough time". 28 (73.7%) of the preferences identified in the patient focus groups were also mentioned by the providers; however, the providers sometimes indicated other priorities. Conclusion: The results show not only what patients consider especially important when communicating with their providers, but also that patient preferences can differ depending on the provider or indication. Not all aspects of communication considered important by patients are also named by providers. This underlines the importance of an individual assessment of patient preferences that enables providers to adopt patient-centered communication behavior.
Keywords: Patient-provider communication, patient participation, communication preferences, focus groups, content analysis
DOI: 10.3233/ZMP-2011-2016
Journal: Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 76-87, 2011
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]