Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Poggel, Dorothe A,; ; | Kasten, Erich | Müller-Oehring, Eva M.; | Bunzenthal, Ulrike | Sabel, Bernhard A.
Affiliations: Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg | Center for Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, Boston VA Medical Center, Mail Sop 151E, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02130; USA | Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston University Medical School, Anatomy and Neurobiology, 650 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA | Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Note: [] Korrespondenzadresse: Prof. Dr. Bernhard A. Sabel, Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Otto-von-Guericke Universität Magdeburg – Medizinische Fakultät, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg. Tel.: +49-391-6117100; Fax: +49-391-6117103; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Improvement of residual vision by visuo-spatial cueing in patients with homonymous visual field loss Objectives: In areas of residual vision of patients with visual field defects, perceptual thresholds are elevated. Can visual performance of patients – like in healthy subjects – be improved by orienting attention at the visual field border with a spatial cue? Methods: Experiment 1: Test of immediate, short-term effects of attention of a spatial cue in a visual field test. Experiment 2: Use of the same cue in a training program for the restoration of visual functions (experimental group) and comparison with the effects of visual field training without a cue (control group). Results: Experiment 1: Compared to uncued conditions, stimulus detection was increased and reaction times were decreased after presentation of a cue. The size of the attention effect depended on the size of the area of residual vision. Experiment 2: The experimental group showed a more pronounced permanent increase of intact field size in the cued area than in unattended regions or than the control group. The cue changed the topographical pattern of visual field plasticity. Conclusion: A systematic combination of light stimulation (bottom-up) at the visual field border with spatial attention (top-down) yields short-term as well as long-term improvement of visual function that is more pronounced than the effects of light stimulation alone. Cognitive processes established in research with healthy subjects can be implemented in neuropsychological rehabilitation to improve treatment outcome.
Keywords: Brain plasticity, spatial attention, visual field training, recovery of function
Journal: Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 119-131, 2005
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]