Affiliations: [a] Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, İzmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, 35620, Turkey | [b] Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, İzmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, 35620, Turkey | [c] Bonegraft Biomaterials Company, Ege University Technopolis, İzmir, 35100, Turkey
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding authors: Ozan Karaman, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, İzmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, 35620, Turkey. Tel.: +90 232 329 3535/3765; E-mail: [email protected]; Adnan Kaya, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, İzmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, 35620, Turkey. Tel.: +90 232 329 3535; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) and pulsed radio frequency energy (PRFE) have been shown to accelerate wound healing process due to its ability to stimulate cellular proliferation. However, comparative efficacy of PEMF and PRFE on an in vitro wound healing study has yet to be studied. The present study examined the effect of PEMF and PRFE on an in vitro wound healing model developed by using 3T3 mouse fibroblasts. Cells were exposed to PEMF (75 Hz frequency, square waveform, and 1-mT magnetic field) and PRFE (27.12 MHz, Phase-shift keying (PSK), and 13-dBm amplitude signal) for 5 hours. The migration rates of 3T3 fibroblasts were determined by capturing images at time points of 0, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Cell proliferation was also quantified. The results of the migration and proliferation assays showed that PEMF and PRFE applied groups had significantly greater cell proliferation and migration compared to control group. In addition, PRFE application showed significantly faster wound area closure compared to PEMF application.
Keywords: Pulsed radio frequency energy (PRFE), pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF), wound healing, rectangular spiral applicator
