Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Nyame, Gabriel; * | Qin, Zhiguang
Affiliations: School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Gabriel Nyame, School of Information and Software Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Qingshuihe Campus No. 2006, Xiyuan Ave, West Hi-Tech Zone, Chengdu, Sichuan 61173, China. Tel.: +8613258275323; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Knowledge remains an essential intangible resource for competitive advantage in organizations. In the context of knowledge management (KM) strategy, knowledge management systems (KMS) help to manage scattered knowledge and promote knowledge innovation. However, KMS adoption is context-specific and depends on several factors. OBJECTIVE:This paper proposes a five-factor model and tests empirically the presence support and effectiveness of these factors, which are antecedent to KMS adoption. METHODS:The University of Education, Winneba (UEW) in Ghana, was used as an illustrative case to test the applicability of the model. As regards the data analysis, we collected data from teaching and non-teaching staff using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. We reviewed the extant literature thoroughly to explore the five factors to develop our conceptual model. The factors are management and leadership support (MaLS), knowledge sharing and transfer capability (KSaTC), support of knowledge architecture and infrastructure (SKAaI), knowledge innovation capability (KIC), and knowledge access control policy (KACP). RESULTS:Our study established that SKAaI has a positive and significant relationship with KSaTC, MaLS, and KACP. Also, MaLS correlated positively and significantly with KSaTC, while KSaTC has a significant direct relationship with KIC but an inverse relationship with KACP. Thus, this study is useful to both researchers and practitioners regarding a thorough examination of these factors. CONCLUSIONS:Practitioners and researchers must systematically examine these five factors concerning their extent of the impact, prioritization, and significant contribution to KM strategies.
Keywords: Knowledge management system, knowledge access control, factor presence and effectiveness, knowledge architecture and infrastructure, knowledge management
DOI: 10.3233/HSM-190791
Journal: Human Systems Management, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 381-398, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]