Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Tsouknidas, Alexander; | Maropoulos, Stergios | Savvakis, Savvas | Michailidis, Nikolaos
Affiliations: Laboratory for Machine Tools and Manufacturing Engineering, School of Polytechnics, Aristoteles University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece | Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Western Macedonia, Kozani, Greece | Laboratory for Physical Metallurgy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aristoteles University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Alexander Tsouknidas, Laboratory for Machine Tools and Manufacturing Engineering, Office 715, 9th floor of building D, School of Polytechnics, Aristoteles University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece. Tel.: +30 2310 995940; Fax: +30 2310 996059; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: Recent advances in Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing techniques (CAD/CAM) have facilitated the rapid and precise construction of customized implants used for craniofacial reconstruction. Data of the patients' trauma, acquired through Computer Topographies (CT), provide sufficient information with regard to the defect contour profile, thus allowing a thorough preoperative evaluation whilst ensuring excellent implant precision. During the selection, however, of a suitable implant material for the specific trauma, the mechanical aspects of the implant have to be considered. This investigation aims to assess the mechanical strength, the shock resistance and the critical deflection of cranial implants manufactured with two commonly used materials, Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and Ti6Al4V. Even though the strength properties of Ti-alloys are far superior to those of PMMA, there are several aspects that may act in advantage of PMMA, e.g., it is known that discontinuities in the elastic modulus of adjoined parts (bone-implant) lead to bone resorption thus loosening the fixation of the implant over time.The implant design and fixation was the same in both cases allowing a direct comparison of the implant behavior for various loads. Finite Element Methods (FEM) assisted procedures were employed, providing a valuable insight to the neurocranial protection granted by these implants.
Keywords: Cranial implant, FEM, mechanical properties, neurocranial protection
DOI: 10.3233/BME-2011-0663
Journal: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 139-147, 2011
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]