Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Cuvelier, Lucie | Falzon, Pierre | Granry, Jean-Claude | Moll, Marie Christine | Orliaguet, Gilles
Affiliations: Centre d'Etudes de l'Emploi (Cee), Noisy-le-Grand, France | CRTD, Cnam, Paris, France | Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital, Angers, France | Department of Quality-Risk Assessment, University Hospital Angers, Angers, France | Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Paris Descartes, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Lucie Cuvelier, Centre d'Etudes de l'Emploi (Cee), 29, promenade Michel Simon, 93166 Noisy-le-Grand Cedex, France. Tel.: +33 1 45 92 68 46; Fax: +33 1 44 10 79 34; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Objective: Anticipation and planning are essential steps of risk management but the mechanisms of planning behavior are incompletely understood, especially the factors including collective work. The aim of this research is to understand how anesthetists plan safe solution to perform anesthesia. Methods: A study based on interviews was conducted in two French hospitals. Data processing focused on the main decisions made by 20 anesthetists during two simulated pre-anesthetic consultation. The main decisions made have been identified and the decision criteria have been analyzed. Results: To ensure patient safety, all anesthetists do not plan the same solution. The rejection or the selection of solutions by each physician rests on two types of criteria: the assessment of risks for the patient and the assessment of resources available to handle the situation. For the latter, the knowledge on the individual skills of each and the adoption of “local benchmark practices” play an essential role. Conclusion: Ultra safe performance in highly variable systems cannot be achieved only through standardization but also through the possibility and ability of the subjects to adapt their practices to their own skills and to that of their colleagues. The conditions for the development of this “adaptative safety” are discussed.
Keywords: Decision making, anesthesia, patient safety, human factors, teamwork
DOI: 10.3233/JRS-2012-0564
Journal: International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 125-136, 2012
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]