Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Buffart, Tineke E. | Tijssen, Marianne | Krugers, Thijs | Carvalho, Beatriz | Smeets, Serge J. | Brakenhoff, Ruud H. | Grabsch, Heike | Meijer, Gerrit A. | Sadowski, Henry B. | Ylstra, Bauke;
Affiliations: Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Department of Otolaryngology/Head–Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, UK | ENZO Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA
Note: [] Corresponding author: Bauke Ylstra, PhD, Head of Microarray Facility, Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 20 444 8299; Fax: +31 20 444 8318; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Background: Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (array CGH) is increasingly applied on DNA obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, but in a proportion of cases this type of DNA is unsuitable. Due to the high experimental costs of array CGH and unreliable methods for DNA quality testing, better prediction methods are needed. The aim of this study was to accurately determine the quality of FFPE DNA input in order to predict quality of array CGH outcome. Material and Methods: DNA quality was assessed by isothermal amplification and compared to array CGH quality on 59 FFPE gastric cancer samples, one FFPE colorectal cancer sample, two FFPE normal uvula samples, one fresh frozen and six FFPE HNSCC samples. Gastric cancer DNA was also quality tested by β-globin PCR. Results: Accurate prediction of DNA quality using the isothermal amplification was observed in the colorectal carcinoma, HNSCC and uvula samples. In gastric cancer samples, the isothermal amplification was a more accurate method for selecting good quality DNA for array CGH compared to using PCR product lengths. The isothermal amplification product was used for array CGH and compared to the results achieved using non-amplified DNA in four of the samples. DNAs before and after amplification yielded the same segmentation patterns of chromosomal copy number changes for both the fresh DNA sample and the FFPE samples. Conclusion: The efficiency of isothermal DNA amplification is a reliable predictor for array CGH quality. The amplification product itself can be used for array CGH, even starting with FFPE derived DNA samples.
Keywords: Array CGH, FFPE, DNA quality, isothermal amplification
Journal: Analytical Cellular Pathology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 351-359, 2007
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]