Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Esa, Arif | Trakhtenbrot, Luba | Hausmann, Michael | Rauch, Joachim | Brok‐Simoni, Frida | Rechavi, Gideon | Ben‐Bassat, Isaac | Cremer, Christoph;
Affiliations: Institute of Applied Physics, Heidelberg, F.R. Germany | Institute of Hematology, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel‐Hashomer, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel‐Aviv University, Israel
Note: [] Correspondence address: Prof. Dr. Christoph Cremer, Institut für Angewandte Physik, Albert‐Überle‐Str. 3‐5, D‐69120 Heidelberg, F.R. Germany. Tel.: +49 6221 549250; Fax: +49 6221 549262.
Abstract: A new fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique called Fast‐FISH in combination with semi‐automated image analysis was applied to detect numerical aberrations of chromosomes 8 and 12 in interphase nuclei of peripheral blood lymphocytes and bone marrow cells from patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Commercially available \alpha‐satellite DNA probes specific for the centromere regions of chromosome 8 and chromosome 12, respectively, were used. After application of the Fast‐FISH protocol, the microscopic images of the fluorescence‐labelled cell nuclei were recorded by the true color CCD camera Kappa CF 15 MC and evaluated quantitatively by computer analysis on a PC. These results were compared to results obtained from the same type of specimens using the same analysis system but with a standard FISH protocol. In addition, automated spot counting after both FISH techniques was compared to visual spot counting after standard FISH. A total number of about 3,000 cell nuclei was evaluated. For quantitative brightness parameters, a good correlation between standard FISH labelling and Fast‐FISH was found. Automated spot counting after Fast‐FISH coincided within a few percent to automated and visual spot counting after standard FISH. The examples shown indicate the reliability and reproducibility of Fast‐FISH and its potential for automatized interphase cell diagnostics of numerical chromosome aberrations. Since the Fast‐FISH technique requires a hybridization time as low as 1/20 of established standard FISH techniques, omitting most of the time consuming working steps in the protocol, it may contribute considerably to clinical diagnostics. This may especially be interesting in cases where an accurate result is required within a few hours.
Keywords: Fast‐FISH, image analysis, spot counting, chromosomal aberrations, hematological malignancies
Journal: Analytical Cellular Pathology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 211-222, 1998
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]