You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Letter to the Editor

(ConcerningAtomic bomb testing and its effects on global male to female ratios at birthby Victor Grech, The International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine 27 (2015), 3544. DOI: 10.3233/JRS-150641)

Dear Editor,

The impact of radiation exposures from nuclear testing [1] and Chernobyl fallout [2, 3] on the male to female ratio at birth has been discussed by Victor Grech, professor at the Department of Pediatrics, Mater Dei Hospital, Malta. However, social factors that could have influenced this ratio were not comprehensively analyzed. The natural radiation background was not mentioned, although additional doses due to the contamination were often negligible compared to doses from the background. Worldwide annual exposures to natural radiation sources are generally expected to be in the range of 1–10 mSv, with 2.4 mSv being the estimate of the central value [4]. The six million residents of the contaminated territories of Belarus, Russia and Ukraine received average individual whole body doses around 9 mSv for the period 1986–2005. For the 98 million people in the three republics, the average dose was 1.3 mSv, a third of which was received in 1986. This is a minor addition to the dose from the global average background radiation for the same period, which is approximately 50 mSv [5]. In other countries, individual doses from the Chernobyl fallout were lower: the first year doses after the accident reached 1 mSv only at singular locations in Central Europe; all country overages were below 1 mSv [6]. The maximum annual dose from the global fallout was estimated to be 0.14 mSv in 1963, having decreased by almost an order of magnitude by 1979. Reported annual individual doses from a number of reactor sites have been in the range 0.001–0.5 mSv [4], so that these dose comparisons pertain also to the reported shift of sex ratios at birth in the vicinity of nuclear facilities [7]. For comparison, a single computed tomographic (CT) examination produces a dose within the range 2–20 mSv, while doses from interventional diagnostic procedures usually range from 5 to 70 mSv [8]. Health risks have never been proven for the above-mentioned doses; an overview is in [9].

Experimental and other relevant research has not been discussed in [1–3]. The following studies should be cited in this connection. Experiments using 18 generations of exposed mice with the daily dose ∼0.29 mGy suggested that low-dose low-rate exposures do not affect the sex ratio in mouse litters [10]. No radiation-induced sex ratio changes in the offspring of mice were found by other researchers [11–15]. On the contrary, a study and review from 1968 concluded that there is a sex ratio shift following spermatogonial exposure in rats [16]. It should be commented that doses used in animal experiments are higher than average doses to the residents of contaminated areas after the Chernobyl accident. These latter doses are generally within “the window for maximum adaptive response protection” [17]. According to experimental data, this window occurs at doses between 1 and 100 mGy from a low dose rate, low LET radiation exposure, where the risk is expected to be reduced below the spontaneous level of cancer risk [17]. Finally, data on the total number of births in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in the years 1956–1962 indicated no significant difference in the sex ratio in infants [18]. Significance of supposedly radiation-related shifts of sex ratios calculated by Grech and co-workers [19, 20] has been questioned [21, 22].

The data and conclusions by Mr. Grech should be viewed taking into account possible mechanisms unrelated to radiation. So, except for the Baltic States, all regions of the former Soviet Union (SU) showed a significant increase in M/T ratio (male live births divided by total live births) from 1986 on [2]. The highest M/F (male/female) ratios at birth were reported from the South Caucasus (Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia) [2, 23], being explained by the son preference and sex-selective abortions [23]. The same might be true for the North Caucasus, where the birthrate has been the highest in Russian Federation [24]. High value is traditionally attached to masculinity in the Caucasus [25]. The elevation of the M/T and M/F ratios at birth coincided with the increasing availability of the prenatal ultrasonic gender testing in the late 1980 s [2, 23]. A relatively high M/T ratio at the time when prenatal gender testing of generally unavailable in the Caucasus (1981-85) [2] might be seen as indication to female neonaticide, the ancient family planning tool [25, 26], after home deliveries e.g. in mountainous areas with underdeveloped infrastructure. Gender imbalance due to the son preference and sex-selective abortions was reported from China, India, Vietnam and some neighboring countries [23, 25] as well as among Asian immigrants to Europe [27] and the USA [28]. On one hand, there are many migrants from the Caucasus in other post-Soviet States (except for the Baltic States mentioned above) and parts of Russian Federation, who bring with them their values and behavior patterns; on the other hand, the same tendencies of son preference might be present also in other groups of the ex-Soviet population favored by manliness propaganda perceivable since the early 2000 s [29]. Insufficient security coupled with the tolerant attitude towards trespasses of laws and regulations might have motivated some families to have sons – for protection and more success. All these social phenomena in the former SU coincided with the elevation of M/F or M/T ratios [2, 23]. Analogously, dynamics of M/T ratio in Western Europe [2, 3] could have been influenced by the ongoing immigration from countries with the a gender imbalance at birth [27].

1Conclusion

The conclusions by Mr. Grech that “elevated levels of man-made ambient radiation may have reduced total births, affecting pregnancies carrying female pregnancies more than those carrying male pregnancies, thereby skewing M/T toward a higher male proportion” [1] and that “the M/T ratio is skewed upward significantly with population exposure to ionizing radiation, even at great distances from major nuclear events” [2] have not been satisfactorily proven. A significant role of radiation from nuclear testing and Chernobyl fallout as a factor modifying the male to female ratio at birth is improbable. If in doubt, it can be verified by large-scale experiments shielded from biases, using different mammal species, comparable radiation doses and dose rates.

References

[1] 

Grech V . Atomic bomb testing and its effects on global male to female ratios at birth. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27(1):35–44.

[2] 

Grech V . The Chernobyl accident, the male to female ratio at birth and birth rates. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2014;57(2):62–7.

[3] 

Grech V . Sex ratios at birth in Scandinavia over the past sixty years. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40:761–4.

[4] 

UNSCEAR 2000 Report. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Annex B: Exposures from natural radiation sources. Annex C: Exposures from man-made sources of radiation. Annex J: Exposures and effects of the Chernobyl accident. New York: United Nations; 2000.

[5] 

UNSCEAR 2008 Report. Report for the General Assembly. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Annex D: Health Effects due to Radiation from the Chernobyl Accident. New York: United Nations; 2008.

[6] 

UNSCEAR 1988 Report. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Annex D: Exposures from the Chernobyl accident. New York: United Nations; 1988.

[7] 

Scherb H , Kusmierz R , Voigt K . Human sex ratio at birth and residential proximity to nuclear facilities in France. Reprod Toxicol. 2016;60:104–11.

[8] 

Mettler FA Jr , Huda W , Yoshizumi TT , Mahesh M . Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: A catalog. Radiology. 2008;248(1):254–63.

[9] 

Jargin SV . Hormesis and radiation safety norms. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2012;31(7):671–5.

[10] 

Nakajima H , Yamaguchi Y , Yoshimura T , Fukumoto M , Todo T . Fukushima simulation experiment: Assessing the effects of chronic low-dose-rate internal 137Cs radiation exposure on litter size, sex ratio, and biokinetics in mice. J Radiat Res. 2015;56(Suppl 1):i29–35.

[11] 

Walsh S , Satkunam M , Su B , Festarini A , Bugden M , Peery H , Mothersill C , Stuart M . Health, growth and reproductive success of mice exposed to environmentally relevant levels of Ra-226 via drinking water over multiple generations. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015;91(7):576–84.

[12] 

Iwasaki T , Hashimoto N , Endoh D , Imanisi T , Itakura C , Sato F . Life span and tumours in the first-generation offspring of the gamma-irradiated male mouse. Int J Radiat Biol. 1996;69(4):487–92.

[13] 

Domingo JL , Paternain JL , Llobet JM , Corbella J . The developmental toxicity of uranium in mice. Toxicology. 1989;55(1-2):143–52.

[14] 

Delcour-Firquet MP . Effects of irradiated wheat flour in the AKR mouse. IV. Effects on reproduction. Toxicol Eur Res. 1983;5(1):27–30.

[15] 

Dev PK , Pareek BP , Goyal PK , Mehta G , Gupta SM . Effects of prenatal gamma-radiation on the development of mice and its modification by 2-mercaptopropionylglycine. Acta Anat (Basel). 1983;116(4):339–45.

[16] 

Havenstein GB , Taylor BA , Hansen JC , Morton NE , Chapman AB . Genetic effects of cumulative x irradiation on the secondary sex ratio of the laboratory rat. Genetics. 1968;59(2):255–74.

[17] 

Mitchel RE . The dose window for radiation-induced protective adaptive responses. Dose Response. 2009;8(2):192–208.

[18] 

Schull WJ , Neel JV , Hashizume A . Some further observations on the sex ratio among infants born to survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Am J Hum Genet. 1966;18:328–38.

[19] 

Scherb H , Grech V , Kusmierz R , Voigt K . Letter to the Editor “Radiation and Environmental Biophysics”: Comment on “Sex ratio at birth: Scenario from normal- and high-level natural radiation areas of Kerala coast in south-west India” by Koya PK, Jaikrishan G, Sudheer KR, Andrews VJ, Madhusoodhanan M, Jagadeesan CK, Das B. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2015 Sep 5. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2016;55(1):3–4.

[20] 

Grech V . Births and male:female birth ratio in Scandinavia and the United Kingdom after the Windscale fire of October 1957. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26(1):45–53.

[21] 

Koya PK , Jaikrishan G , Sudheer KR , Andrews VJ , Madhusoodhanan M , Jagadeesan CK , Das B . Letter to the Editor “Radiation and environmental biophysics” Authors’ response to comments by Scherb et al. (REBS-D-15-00121) on “Sex ratio at birth: Scenario from normal- and high-level natural radiation areas of Kerala coast in Southwest India” REBS 54:453-463 (2015). Radiat Environ Biophys. 2016;55(1):5–7.

[22] 

Körblein A . Letter to the editor. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26(3):171.

[23] 

Michael M , King L , Guo L , McKee M , Richardson E , Stuckler D . The mystery of missing female children in the Caucasus: An analysis of sex ratios by birth order. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013;39(2):97–102.

[24] 

Rate of natural population increase in the federal subjects of Russia. Wikipedia in Russian https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Естественный_прирост_населения_субъектов_Российской_Федерации (retrieved March 10, 2016)

[25] 

Saidov TG , Saidova AG , Magomedov GI . Culture and traditions of the peoples of Dagestan. 2nd edition. Makhachkala: Institute of Pedagogy; 2010 (in Russian).

[26] 

Hesketh T , Lu L , Xing ZW . The consequences of son preference and sex-selective abortion in China and other Asian countries. CMAJ. 2011;183(12):1374–7.

[27] 

Drixler FF . Mabiki: Infanticide and population growth in Eastern Japan, 1660-1950. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press; 2013.

[28] 

Singh N , Pripp AH , Brekke T , Stray-Pedersen B . Different sex ratios of children born to Indian and Pakistani immigrants in Norway. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:40.

[29] 

Egan JF , Campbell WA , Chapman A , Shamshirsaz AA , Gurram P , Benn PA . Distortions of sex ratios at birth in the United States; evidence for prenatal gender selection. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(6):560–5.