Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Woodard, Stacy; | Lemeshow, Stanley | Chen, Meng | Fitzner, Julia | Duclos, Philippe
Affiliations: Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University | World Health Organization, Department of Vaccines and Biologicals
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Stacy Woodard, PhD, 1217 Mossy Glade Circle, Apex, NC, USA. Tel.: +1 919 924 6399; Fax: +1 919 998 2382; E‐mail: [email protected].
Abstract: A simulation study was conducted to assess the accuracy and precision of the proposed sampling design for the World Health Organization (WHO) Injection Safety Assessment Survey. The proposed sampling design specifies that 8 clusters would be selected with probability proportionate to the size (PPS) of the population, and within each of the selected clusters, 10 health care facilities would be randomly selected. Two artificial populations were created based on the two African countries in which the assessment was pilot tested. To create a wide variety of hypothetical populations, the assignment of whether a health care facility was safe or not was based on the different combinations of the population proportion of safe health care facilities in the country and the homogeneity of the districts in the country with respect to injection safety. Based on results obtained through univariate and multi‐factor analysis of variance, it was found that the absolute bias, standard error, and MSE are all significantly smaller when the true population proportion of safe health care facilities for both the urban and rural clusters is small (p=0.10) or large (p=0.90), as compared to the populations with differing urban and rural proportions; and that the populations with homogeneous clusters (i.e., standard deviation =0.01) had lower absolute bias, standard error, and MSE. From this study, we conclude that this sampling design yields an unbiased estimate of the true proportion of safe health care facilities in a country, and has an average precision of plus/minus 13.6 percentage points.
Keywords: Sampling design, injection safety, simulation
Journal: International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 159-170, 2004
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]