Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: 1st Congress of the International Academy of Digital Pathology Quebec City, Canada, August 3–5, 2011. Part II
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Laurinavicius, Arvydas; | Laurinaviciene, Aida; | Dasevicius, Darius; | Elie, Nicolas | Plancoulaine, Benoît | Bor, Catherine; | Herlin, Paulette
Affiliations: National Center of Pathology, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania | Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania | Institute of Oncology Vilnius, University, Vilnius, Lithuania | GRECAN, University of Caen and F. Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center, Caen, France | Pathology Department, F. Baclesse Comprehensive Cancer Center, Caen, France
Note: [] Corresponding author: Arvydas Laurinavicius, National Center of Pathology, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Klinikos, P.Baublio 5, LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania. Tel.: +370 5 272 0664 (W) and +370 5 272 0044 (F); E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Pathology has recently entered the era of personalized medicine. This brings new expectations for the accuracy and precision of tissue-based diagnosis, in particular, when quantification of histologic features and biomarker expression is required. While for many years traditional pathologic diagnosis has been regarded as ground truth, this concept is no longer sufficient in contemporary tissue-based biomarker research and clinical use. Another major change in pathology is brought by the advancement of virtual microscopy technology enabling digitization of microscopy slides and presenting new opportunities for digital image analysis. Computerized vision provides an immediate benefit of increased capacity (automation) and precision (reproducibility), but not necessarily the accuracy of the analysis. To achieve the benefit of accuracy, pathologists will have to assume an obligation of validation and quality assurance of the image analysis algorithms. Reference values are needed to measure and control the accuracy. Although pathologists' consensus values are commonly used to validate these tools, we argue that the ground truth can be best achieved by stereology methods, estimating the same variable as an algorithm is intended to do. Proper adoption of the new technology will require a new quantitative mentality in pathology. In order to see a complete and sharp picture of a disease, pathologists will need to learn to use both their analogue and digital eyes.
Keywords: Quantitative pathology, image processing, quality control, stereology
DOI: 10.3233/ACP-2011-0033
Journal: Analytical Cellular Pathology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 75-78, 2012
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]