Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: West, Nathanael | Snodgrass, Suzanne J. | James, Carole; *
Affiliations: School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Carole James, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan NSW 2308, Australia. Tel.: +61 02 49216632; Fax: +61 02 49216998; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Limited literature exists investigating biomechanical changes during a Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE). OBJECTIVE:To determine change in joint angle measurement between minimum load to safe maximum load in the bench to shoulder lift of the WorkHab FCE. METHODS:Dartfish ProSuite was used to analyse bench to shoulder lift video from 28 subjects. Measurements of joint angle at lumbar spine, thoracic spine, elbow and shoulder at four points in the ascending and descending lift phases (0/3, 1/3, 2/3, 3/3) in the minimum load and safe maximum lift were collected. Paired t-tests were used to analyse differences in joint angles between lifts. RESULTS:Significant differences in joint angles were identified in the thoracic spine, elbow and shoulder at maximal weight. Increased extension occurred: Thoracic spine at 3/3 ascending [2.922, 95% CI 0.8, 3.8, p = 0.004]. Increased flexion occurred: elbow ascending [1/3:6.405, 95% CI –11.8, 1.8, p = 0.008],[3/3:15.575, 95% CI 4.2, 27.0, p = 0.009]; elbow descending [0/3:18.446, 95% CI 9.5, 27.4, p = 0.000]; shoulder ascending [3/3:16.785, 95% CI 11.8, 21.8, p < 0.001]; shoulder descending [0/3:16.647, 95% CI 10.6, 22.7, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS:This study provides insight into the biomechanical changes during a bench to shoulder lift and support observations and clinical reasoning used in determining the safe maximal lift.
Keywords: Functional Capacity Evaluation, magnitude of load, bench to shoulder lift, manual handling
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-172677
Journal: Work, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 201-210, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]