Affiliations: [a] Department of Paramedic, Gazi University, Vocational School of Health Services, Ankara, Türkiye
| [b] Civil Defense and Firefighting Department, Kayseri University Bünyan Vocational School, Kayseri, Türkiye
| [c] Department of Paramedic, Lect. Kayseri University, Vocational School of Health Services, Kayseri, Türkiye
| [d] Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medical, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Türkiye
Correspondence:
[*]
Address for correspondence: Ismet Çelebi (Ph.D), Gazi University, Vocational School of Health Services, Gölbaşi Campuss Ankara, Türkiye. Tel.: +905522300112; E-mail: [email protected]; ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6494-2908.
Note: [1] ORCID ID: 0000-0002-1373-3188.
Note: [2] ORCID ID: 0000-0002-6805-2347.
Note: [3] ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3203-198X.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:The concept of “Quiet Quitting”, which might be considered new in the literature, is used to describe a passive and silent giving up. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study is to develop a scale to evaluate both the causes and consequences of “quiet quitting” which is believed to be increasing for various reasons in our country as well as in the world. METHOD:Five-stage scale development method which was presented by Cohen and Swerdik was used in the process of developing the Quiet Quitting Reason and Behavior Scale (QQRBS). First, the conceptual structure of the scale was determined. In the second stage, the scale was structured. Structuring the scale is deciding on the scale type and scaling technique. The third stage is the first application of the scale. After the scale was applied, factor analysis, internal consistency assessment and validity studies were carried out in the item analysis section, which is the fourth stage. The fifth stage is the second application stage of the scale and at this stage, the scale was reviewed by test-retest and an application guideline was prepared. RESULTS:Cronbach’s alpha value of draft items is 0.87, quiet quitting behavior sub-dimension Cronbach’s Alpha value is 0.76 and reasons for quiet quitting Cronbach’s Alpha value is 0.820. It was decided to keep the remaining 35 items after EFA analysis because the corrected correlation numbers of the items were >0.30. This study explains the design and development process of the QQRBS in Turkish society. CONCLUSION:According to this developed scale, as the scale mean score of the total and sub-dimensions increases, the tendency to quiet quitting increases.
