Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Work-related Pain
Guest editors: Karen Jacobs and Remko Soer
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Goggins, Katie A.a; * | Thompson, Taryn J.a; b | Lessel, Courtney E.a | Kelly, Elizabeth A.a; c | O’Hara, Dawson E.L.a; c | Eger, Tammy R.a; d
Affiliations: [a] Centre for Research in Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University, Greater Sudbury ON, Canada | [b] School of Natural Sciences, Laurentian University, Greater Sudbury ON, Canada | [c] Bharti School of Engineering, Laurentian University, Greater Sudbury ON, Canada | [d] Office of Research Services, Laurentian University, Greater Sudbury, ON, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Katie A. Goggins, Centre for Research in Occupational Safety and Health, Laurentian University, 935 Ramsey Lake Road, Greater Sudbury ON, P3E 2C6, Canada. E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Occupational foot-transmitted vibration (FTV) exposure is common in industries like mining, construction, and agriculture, often leading to acute and chronic injuries. Vibration assessments require technical expertise and equipment which can be costly for employers to perform. Alternatively, researchers have observed that self-reported discomfort can be used as an effective indicator of injury risk. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of standing FTV exposure on self-reported ratings of discomfort, and whether these subjective ratings differed by body area and exposure frequency. METHODS: Participants (n = 30) were randomly exposed to standing FTV at six frequencies (25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 Hz) for 20–45 seconds. Following each exposure, participants rated discomfort on a scale of 0–9 in four body areas: head and neck (HN), upper body (UB), lower body (LB), and total body. RESULTS: Results indicated that participants experienced the most discomfort in the LB at higher frequencies (p < 0.001), consistent with the resonance of foot structures. The HN discomfort tended to decrease as the exposure frequency increased, although not statistically significant (p > 0.0167). The UB discomfort remained relatively low across all frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests a potential connection between resonant frequencies and discomfort, potentially indicating injury risk. Although self-reported discomfort is insufficient for directly assessing injury risk from FTV, it provides a simple method for monitoring potential musculoskeletal risks related to vibration exposure at resonant frequencies. While professional vibration assessment remains necessary, self-reported discomfort may act as an early indicated of vibration-induced injuries, aiding in implementing mitigation strategies.
Keywords: Occupational injuries, foot injuries, repetitive strain injury, musculoskeletal diseases, pain, ache
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230491
Journal: Work, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 153-165, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]