Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Special Section: Physical Employment Standards
Guest editors: Robin M. Orr, Gemma S. Milligan, Sam D. Blacker, Jace Drain, Tara Reilly, Etienne Chassé, Andrew Siddall, Stephen Foulis, Helen Kilding and Veronica Jamnik
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Carstairs, Greg L.a; * | Michael, Scott W.b; 1 | Groeller, Herbertb; 2 | Drain, Jace R.a; 3
Affiliations: [a] Human and Decision Sciences Division, Defence Science and Technology Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia | [b] Centre for Medical and Exercise Physiology, School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Greg L. Carstairs, Human and Decision Sciences Division, Defence Science and Technology Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]; ORCID 0009-0009-5952-5980
Note: [1] ORCID 0000-0001-6184-5814.
Note: [2] ORCID 0000-0003-4881-150X.
Note: [3] ORCID 0000-0002-7945-0041.
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Militaries have historically utilised generic physical fitness tests to assess physical readiness, but there has been a recent shift to develop physical employment standards (PES) based on actual job demands. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this investigation was to characterise the physical demands of critical tasks performed by Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) personnel to inform PES development. METHODS:Job task analysis were performed for 27 RAAF trades. Criterion tasks were identified through a systematic approach involving workshops and field-observations. The identified tasks were assessed for dominant physical capacity and grouped into movement-based clusters. Psychophysiological measures were collected from personnel performing the tasks. RESULTS:Of 87 criterion tasks, 92% were characterised as manual handling dominant. Across these 87 tasks the principal physical capacities were: muscular strength (59%), muscular endurance (52%) and cardiorespiratory endurance (39%). The most common movement clusters were Lift to Platform (44%) and Lift and Carry (38%). Lift to Platform tasks required lifting to a median height of 1.32 m (1.20 –1.65 m) and a median mass of 25.0 kg (21.0 –28.9 kg) per person. Median carry mass was 25.0 kg (22.4 –36.1 kg) per person and distance was 26.0 m (17.5 –50.0 m). Median task mean ’Vdot;O2, HR and RPE were 1.8 L.min- 1 (1.5–2.2 L.min- 1), 137 b.min- 1 (120–144) and 13 (12–14). CONCLUSIONS:The high proportion of manual handling criterion tasks emphasises the importance of these activities and the underlying physical capacities for RAAF personnel. Current fitness assessments are unlikely to predict job task performance.
Keywords: Physical employment standards, job task analysis, physical demands analysis, muscular strength, muscular endurance, cardiorespiratory endurance, lift, lift and carry, military
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230274
Journal: Work, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 1319-1329, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]