Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Review Article
Authors: Niazi, Aimana; 1 | Memon, Mumtaz Alib; c; *; 1 | Sarwar, Naukhezb | Obaid, Asfiab | Mirza, Muhammad Zeeshanb | Amjad, Kainaatb
Affiliations: [a] Department of Management, National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Rawalpindi, Pakistan | [b] NUST Business School, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan | [c] Faculty of Business, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Mumtaz Ali Memon, Faculty of Business, Sohar University, Sohar, Oman. E-mails: [email protected] and [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0003-4623-9693.
Note: [1] Aiman Niazi and Mumtaz Ali Memon should be considered joint first authors.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Work intensification can lead to both work-related and non-work-related outcomes that positively and negatively affect the employee, organization, and job in question. The criticality of this phenomena necessitates conducting a systematic review to capture the essence of the extant literature. OBJECTIVE: This paper presents a systematic review of the literature on work intensification from 1989 to 2022. It reviews the conceptualization of the construct, explores the factors influencing work intensification, identifies its outcomes, moderators, and mediators, and provides a review of the theories that have been used to support the phenomena of work intensification. METHODS: The systematic review employed the PRISMA approach to screen 2823 records from the Web of Science database and extract 74 quantitative studies for final examination. RESULTS: Firstly, work intensification has primarily been conceptualized through various constructs such as workload, long work hours, and time pressure. Secondly, there are well-established positive and negative outcomes associated with work intensification, either directly or through mediators. Thirdly, both the conservation of resource theory and the job-demands resource theory are widely utilized to support models related to work intensification. CONCLUSION: The study urges practitioners to enhance their efforts in effectively managing employees’ intensified work demands, particularly in relation to work overload, working hours, and time pressure. By addressing these factors, organizations can minimize negative outcomes and promote positive consequences.
Keywords: Work intensification, work overload, time pressure, long work hours
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230193
Journal: Work, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 769-787, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]