Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Otte, Thomasa; * | Decuman, Saskiaa; 1 | Gelade, Wouterb; 2 | Duyver, Corentinc; 3
Affiliations: [a] Department of Disability Benefits, National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Brussels, Belgium | [b] Center for Research in the Economics of Development, University of Namur, Namur, Belgium | [c] Centre Académique de Médecine Générale (CAMG), UCLouvain University, Brussels, Belgium
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Thomas Otte, Occupational Therapist, Master in Public Health, Department of Disability Benefits, National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance, Avenue Galilée 5, Box 01, 1210 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected]; ORCID: 0000-0001-6315-2739.
Note: [1] ORCID: 0000-0002-7715-2374
Note: [2] ORCID: 0000-0001-7144-714X
Note: [3] ORCID: 0000-0002-1599-5421
Abstract: BACKGROUND:There is willingness in Europe to implement the use of a biopsychosocial model such as the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for assessing work incapacity. OBJECTIVE:A preliminary study was conducted to investigate the perceptions of medical advisers on the value of structuring clients’ biopsychosocial information in an ICF-based report. METHOD:A sample (n = 101) received a perception questionnaire after watching two comparative videos based on a clinical case. Questions relating to work incapacity were also asked. The data was analysed using quantitative methods. Comments were also collected. RESULTS:Before knowing the ICF-based report, 61.96% of the respondents believed a return to work seems possible by providing adapted work or a different job. There is an increase of 8.69 pp (p-value: 0.077) after reading the report. Opening up the initial sample to more insurance physicians (n = 119), the difference is more significant (p-value: 0.012). Also, 71.9% of respondents believe they have a better view of the client’s biopsychosocial situation after reading the report. Respondents recognise the clinical and diagnostic relevance of ICF but say it cannot be used at the moment for various reasons, such as the time required or the need for a multidisciplinary team and effective coordination. Older respondents are less enthusiastic about the appropriateness of using ICF. CONCLUSION:The respondents identify an added value in having a biopsychosocial based-report. After learning about the report, more physicians see opportunities for professional re-integration than before. The medical advisers and their team must be strengthened and receive a clear role in order to empower them.
Keywords: International classification of functioning, disability and health, work capacity evaluation, occupational therapy, vocational rehabilitation
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-210247
Journal: Work, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 1401-1418, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]