Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Dain, Stephen Johna; * | Bridge, Catherineb | Relf, Markc | Lukman, Aldyfra Luhulimab; d | Manandhar, Saritaa | Boon, Mei Yinga; e
Affiliations: [a] School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia | [b] Faculty of the Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia | [c] Association of Consultants in Access Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia | [d] Current address: Faculty of Engineeering, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia | [e] Current Address: Vision Science and Optometry, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT, Australia
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Stephen Dain, School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia. Tel.: +61 414 385 622; Fax: +61 293 138 602; E-mail: [email protected].
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Standards writers, national and international, have used different contrast calculations to set requirements in building elements for people with visual impairments. On the other hand, they have typically set a single requirement (30%) for specifying the minimum contrast. The systems are not linearly related and 30% means something rather different in each system. OBJECTIVE: To provide a comparison of the various scales in order to illustrate the differences caused by multiple scales with a single compliance value, recommend a single scale for universal adoption and, if a new measure is problematic for implementation, to recommend the most perceptually uniform of the present methods. METHODS: We use the contrast between combinations of 205 paint colours to illustrate the relationships between the measures. We use an internationally accepted scale, with equal perceptual steps, as a “gold standard” to identify the most perceptually uniform measurement scale in the existing methods. RESULTS: We show that Michelson contrast is the most perceptually uniform of the existing measurement scales. We show the contrasts in the proposed method that equate to the various current requirements. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that CIE Metric Lightness could be used as the contrast measure. Alternatively, Michelson contrast is the most perceptually linear of the current measurement scales.
Keywords: Accessibility standards, safe navigation, visibility assessment, visual detection, universal design, contrast measures, contrast equations
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-205158
Journal: Work, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 1219-1227, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]