Standing desks for sedentary occupations: Assessing changes in satisfaction and health outcomes after six months of use

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Resendiz, Marisol | Lustik, Michael B. | Conkright, William R. | West, Gordon F.^{; *}

Affiliations: Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA

Correspondence: [*] Address for Correspondence: Gordon West, Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarret White Road, ATTN: LTC West, rm 10C112, Honolulu, HI 96859, USA. Tel.: +1 808 433 2479; Fax: +1 808 433 1395; E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected].

Abstract: BACKGROUND:Standing desks are a low cost option for the reduction of sedentary behavior. OBJECTIVE:This study evaluated changes in utility and health outcomes during a standing desk intervention. METHODS:Thirty-five participants (BMI >25) who reported sitting an average of≥six hours per workday were recruited. Participants were randomized into a control or intervention group. Eleven were enrolled in the control group and 24 in the intervention group. Participants in the intervention group were outfitted with an adjustable standing desktop accessory while participants in the control group maintained a standard work desk. Self-reported and objective measures of sedentary time during an eight hour workday were captured for a baseline and intervention period. Changes in health outcomes and workplace satisfaction were assessed after six months. RESULTS:Self-recorded sedentary behavior decreased by 25% after six months though no changes in health outcomes were observed. Subjective assessments of standing time were over-estimated by 10% (compared to accelerometer recordings) in the intervention group. The intervention group reported higher levels of satisfaction with comfort, customizability, and overall personal workplace. CONCLUSIONS:Despite a decrease in sedentary behavior, no changes in health outcomes occurred after a six month intervention. Future studies should incorporate objective measures of diet and physical activity to assess compensatory behaviors that may offset sedentary reduction. More sensitive health outcome measures should also be considered.

Keywords: Standing desk, workplace sedentary behavior, occupational health

DOI: 10.3233/WOR-192940

Journal: Work, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 347-353, 2019