Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Langerak, Wendy | Langeland, Willie | van Balkom, Anton | Draisma, Stasja | Terluin, Berend | Draijer, Nel
Affiliations: Department of Review and Appeal, The Dutch Institute for Employee Benefit Schemes, Utrecht, The Netherlands | Department of Psychiatry, VU University Medical Center/GGZinGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Department of General Practice and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Wendy Langerak, The Dutch Institute for Employee Benefit Schemes (UWV), Department of Review and Appeal, P.O. Box 2064, 3500 GB Utrecht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 627071043; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the criterion validity and the diagnostic accuracy of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) regarding the identification of depressive and anxiety disorders in an insurance medicine setting. Participants: Our sample consisted of 230 individuals who applied for a work disability benefit due to mental health problems. Methods: Depressive and anxiety disorders were assessed using the 4DSQ and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Internal consistency was determined by calculating Cronbach's alpha values. Criterion validity was evaluated by regression techniques. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic accuracy. Results: Of the 230 participants 109 (47.4%) had a current DSM-IV depressive disorder and 146 (63.5%) an anxiety disorder. The 4DSQ scales showed an excellent internal consistency. The depression scale of the 4DSQ had specific sensitivity for major depressive disorder. The anxiety scale was also sensitive for the anxiety disorders. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) indicated good diagnostic accuracy of the 4DSQ for assessing depressive and/or anxiety disorders: AUC-value 0.81 for both depression and anxiety. Conclusions: Although the 4DSQ shows good criterion validity and diagnostic accuracy with respect to depressive and anxiety disorders in applicants for a work disability benefit due to mental health problems, the feasibility of the 4DSQ as a screening measure for depressive and anxiety disorders is limited due to the high prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders.
Keywords: Work disability, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, criterion validity, screening
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1393
Journal: Work, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 369-380, 2012
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]