Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Vachon, Brigitte | Durand, Marie-José | LeBlanc, Jeannette
Affiliations: Centre d'Action en Prévention et Réadaptation de l'Incapacité au Travail (CAPRIT), Longueuil Campus, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada | Department of Psychology, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Brigitte Vachon, PhD(c), OT, Centre d'Action en Prévention et Réadaptation de l'Incapacité au Travail (CAPRIT), Longueuil Campus, Université de Sherbrooke, 1111 Saint-Charles W., Suite 101, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada, J4K 5G4. Tel.: +1 450 466 5000, ext 3692; Fax: +1 450 674 5237; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Objective: Occupational therapists (OTs) engage in continuing education to integrate best available knowledge and skills into their practice. However, many barriers influence the degree to which they are currently able to integrate research evidence into their clinical decision making process. The specific objectives were to explore the clinical decision-making processes they used, and to describe the empowerment process they developed to become evidence-based practitioners. Participants: Eight OTs, who had attended a four-day workshop on evidence-based work rehabilitation, were recruited to participate to a reflective practice group. Methods: A collaborative research methodology was used. The group was convened for 12 meetings and held during a 15-month period. The data collected was analyzed using the grounded theory method. Results: The results revealed the different decision-making modes used by OTs: defensive, repressed, cautious, autonomous intuitive and autonomous thoughtful. These modes influenced utilization of evidence and determined the stances taken toward practice change. Reflective learning facilitated their utilization of an evidence-based practice model through a three-level empowerment process: deliberateness, client-centeredness and system mindedness. Conclusions: During the course of this study, participants learned to become evidence-based practitioners. This process had an impact on how they viewed their clients, their practice and the work rehabilitation system.
Keywords: Work rehabilitation, evidence-based practice, occupational therapy, clinical reasoning, reflective practice, collaborative research
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-1063
Journal: Work, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 119-134, 2010
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]