Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: 20th Anniversary Issue
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Leyshon, Rhysa | Chalova, Katrina | Gerson, Leigh | Savtchenko, Alex | Zakrzewski, Remik | Howie, Andrew | Shaw, Lynn
Affiliations: Doctoral Program in Rehabilitation Science, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada | School of Occupational Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada | School of Kinesiology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Rhysa Leyshon, Doctoral Program in Rehabilitation Science, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, N6G 1H1. Tel.: +1 519 661 2111 ext. 88979; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Introduction: Ergonomic interventions designed for office and computer work have become widely available and heavily marketed but there is little evidence to support their use with workers who already have a musculoskeletal disorder (MSD). The purpose of any ergonomic intervention can be to improve worker comfort, safety and/or productivity. The ergonomic research in secondary prevention typically focuses outcomes on improved worker comfort but less if any emphasis has been put on productivity and safety. The purpose of this study was to determine the level and quality of evidence supporting ergonomic interventions to improve the comfort, safety and/or productivity of office workers with symptoms of MSDs. Method: A search of the ergonomic intervention literature based on MSDs of four body areas (low back, upper limb, eye and neck) was employed. The studies underwent two levels of analysis for inclusion in a best-evidence synthesis approach, which included a priori evaluation of specific interventions relative to outcomes of comfort, safety and/or productivity. Results: Twenty-seven out of 202 articles were synthesized based on relevance, quality and significant results. Only 8 articles were determined high quality and no strong levels of evidence were identified. Levels of evidence for specific ergonomic interventions ranged from insufficient to moderate. Generally outcomes were focused mostly on improved comfort of workers. Conclusions: There is still limited quality research that addresses ergonomic interventions designed for secondary prevention. Further high quality studies are needed to support evidence-based ergonomic interventions in practice. For all stakeholders to fully evaluate the usefulness of the ergonomic intervention studies need to attend to outcomes not only of worker comfort but also to productivity and safety.
Keywords: Office work, intervention, musculoskeletal disorder, outcome, ergonomics
DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2010-0994
Journal: Work, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 335-348, 2010
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]