Affiliations: Department of Rehabilitation, Human Resources, and
Communication Disorders, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA | Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation,
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA | Department of Educational Foundations & Special
Services, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Richard T. Roessler, RHRC
Department, GE153, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. Tel.:
+1 479 575 6414; Fax: +1 479 575 3319; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Using multiple correspondence analysis, data from the US Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (1992–2003) were examined for types and
patterns of allegations of discrimination filed by adults with multiple
sclerosis (MS) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Women comprised the majority of the Charging Parties (n=687, 67%), and
most of the Charging Parties were White (n=769, 76%). The total number
of allegations studied (N=3,668) was divided into two datasets,
specifically 1,142 occurring separately and 2,526 occurring as part of a
multiple allegation set. The four most frequent allegations were related to
discharge, reasonable accommodation, terms and conditions of employment, and
harassment. Multiple correspondence analysis indicated that a 5 axis model was
required to explain approximately 50% of the variance in allegation
patterns, and no charging party or employer characteristics were related to the
axes. Axis themes derived from perceived discrimination on the part of
employers included threats to retention (2 axes), employer hostility, informal
or formal employer actions, and barriers to career mobility. Results supported
the need for rehabilitation counseling interventions to help adults with MS
identify and address precipitants to discharge (involuntary termination) or
constructive discharge (voluntary termination in response to an untenable work
situation).
