Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: de Jong, Andrew | Wang-Bennett, Lolin T. | Liebl, Daniel J. | Coker, Newton J.
Affiliations: Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 (U.S.A.)
Note: [] Correspondence: L.T. Wang-Bennett, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A.
Abstract: In order to compare the extent of axonal regeneration in two surgical nerve repair procedures, we measured the levels of the neurofilament (NF) proteins in the regenerating facial nerve of adult New Zealand rabbits. The animals were operated on bilaterally, with a chamber model placed on one side and a cable graft model inserted on the contralateral side. Normal nerve from unoperated animals or nerve removed during nerve repair surgery served as controls. Using immunoblot techniques and densitometric measurement, we examined specific changes in the individual NF [High (H), Medium (M), and Low (L) molecular weight (MW)] in the regenerating nerve at 3 and 7 weeks postoperation time. Linearity of the densitometric system was established by separation of serial dilutions of known NF on the gel, and blotting for immunostaining. The amount of all 3 NF's decreased during the regeneration process compared to normal nerve, but there were differences between the two procedures. The NFH in the distal segment of the chamber repaired nerve at 7 weeks was 60–70% of the preoperative state, which correlated with a previous morphological study of axona) caliber during regeneration. At 3 weeks, NF content was lower in the distal segment of the chamber than in the distal cable graft. By 7 weeks, NF content was similar in proximal and distal segments of both models. Thus, although initial regeneration is slower in the chamber model, the eventual outcome is similar in both chamber and graft.
Keywords: Peripheral nerve regeneration, Regeneration chamber, Cable nerve graft, Cytoskeletal proteins, Facial nerve, Rabbit
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-1991-3303
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 149-156, 1991
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]