Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Röder, Brigittea; * | Krämer, Ulrike M.b | Lange, Kathrinc
Affiliations: [a] Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, University of Hamburg, Germany | [b] Department of Psychology II, Neuropsychology, University of Magdeburg, Germany | [c] Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Brigitte Röder, University of Hamburg, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology, Von-Melle-Park 11, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany. Tel.: +49 (0)40 428383251; Fax: +49 (0)40 428386591; E-mail: [email protected]; http://bpn.uni-hamburg.de.
Abstract: Purpose: Superior temporal processing skills, both in the auditory and tactile system have been reported in blind as compared to sighted humans. The present experiment tested whether blind people prefer, as a possible consequence, temporal rather than spatial stimulus selection strategies. Methods: Eight congenitally blind adults were tested in a selective attention experiment that simultaneously manipulated spatial and temporal attention. Participants had to attend to an auditory offset stimulus demarcating the end of a short (600 ms) or long (1200 ms) interval. They had to detect slightly less intense offset markers at the attended point in time presented in the left (half of the trials) or right (other half of the trials) hemifield. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded throughout the experiment. Results: Whereas the N1 was significantly enhanced by both spatial and temporal attention in the sighted (see Lange, Kramer, & Röder, 2006), only a temporal attention effect was found in the blind. Moreover, in both groups a second, longer lasting negativity was observed for offset markers presented at the attended as compared to the unattended spatial location. This negativity was modulated by temporal attention only in the blind. Conclusion: These results are consistent with the assumption of a higher priority of time for stimulus selection in the absence of vision from birth.
Keywords: Neuroplasticity, blindness, temporal attention, spatial attention, auditory event-related potential
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 3-4, pp. 311-322, 2007
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]