Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Roumengous, Thibault; * | Peterson, Carrie L.
Affiliations: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Thibault Roumengous, Biotech Eight, 737 N 5th St, Richmond, VA 23219, Virginia, USA. Tel.: +1 804 827 5270; E-mail: [email protected]. (TR)
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Assessment of voluntary activation is useful in the study of neuromuscular impairments, particularly after spinal cord injury (SCI). Measurement of voluntary activation with transcranial magnetic stimulation (VATMS) is limited by technical challenges, including the difficulty in preferential stimulation of cortical neurons projecting to the target muscle and minimal stimulation of antagonists. Thus, the motor evoked potential (MEP) response to TMS in the target muscle compared to its antagonist may be an important parameter in the assessment of VATMS. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of isometric elbow flexion angle on two metrics in individuals with tetraplegia following SCI: 1) the ratio of biceps/triceps MEP amplitude across a range of voluntary efforts, and 2) VATMS. METHODS:Ten individuals with tetraplegia and ten nonimpaired individuals were recruited to participate in three sessions wherein VATMS was assessed at 45°, 90°, and 120° of isometric elbow flexion. RESULTS:In SCI participants, the biceps/triceps MEP ratio was not modulated by elbow angle. In nonimpaired participants, the biceps/triceps MEP ratio was greater in the more flexed elbow angle (120° flexion) compared to 90° during contractions of 50% and 75% MVC, but VATMS was not different. VATMS assessed in the more extended elbow angle (45° flexion) was lower relative to 90° elbow flexion; this effect was dependent on the biceps/triceps MEP ratio. In both groups, VATMS was sensitive to the linearity of the voluntary moment and superimposed twitch relationship, regardless of elbow angle. Linearity was lower in SCI relative to nonimpaired participants. CONCLUSIONS:Increasing the MEP ratio via elbow angle did not enable estimation of VATMS in SCI participants. VATMS may not be a viable approach to assess neuromuscular function in individuals with tetraplegia.
Keywords: Spinal cord injury, central activation ratio; arm posture, biceps brachii, voluntary contraction, interpolated twitch technique, quadriplegia
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-221254
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 169-184, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]