Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Neural Plasticity and Transplantation in Spinal Cord Injuries
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bernstein, Jerald J.; ; | Goldberg, William J.;
Affiliations: Laboratory of Central Nervous System Injury and Regeneration, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC 20422 (U.S.A.) | Department of Neurosurgery, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, 20037 (U.S.A.) | Department of Physiology, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, 20037 (U.S.A.)
Note: [] Correspondence: J. Bernstein, DVA Medical Center (151 Q), 50 Irving st., Washington, DC 20422, U.S.A.
Abstract: In a ‘double blind’ study, 2 series of adult rats were trained to traverse a narrow bar or a horizontal ladder for a water reward. Hindlimb placement (measured as hindlimb foot slips) of the subjects trained on the narrow platform was ranked. The subjects traversing the ladder were videotaped and the number of hindlimb slips counted. After reaching criterion (10 complete traverses on each of 2 consecutive days), all animals had the fasciculus gracilis (FG) of the third cervical spinal cord segment (C3) aspirated to sever hindlimb dorsal column afferents. After aspiration of C3FG the subjects were randomly placed in an aspiration-only (controls) or aspiration + graft group. All grafts were prelabeled with the plant lectin Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHAL) as a graft-derived cell marker. The grafts were either unoriented whole pieces of E14 fetal spinal cord or 105 purified, cultured, E14 fetal spinal cord astrocytes. Subjects were tested at intervals over 90 days. Aspiration of C3FG and a graft of whole pieces of E14 fetal spinal cord resulted in a statistically significant improvement in hindlimb placement at 21 and 90 days (P < 0.05) when compared to controls. In contrast, animals with cultured, purified, E14 fetal spinal cord astrocyte grafts had significantly worse (P < 0.05) hindlimb placement than controls. Immunohistochemical double staining for PHAL and glial fibrillary acidic protein in the same cell showed that astrocytes from both types of grafts migrated to the nucleus gracilis (NG) of the medulla of the host. The grafted fetal astrocytes from the whole piece grafts prevented denervation atrophy of the host NG neurons, whereas cultured grafted fetal astrocytes did not demonstrate this effect. After grafting donor tissue that contained astrocytes into the injured spinal cord there were two accompanying classes of astrocytes. One class derived from whole piece, E14, fetal spinal cord grafts migrated to the NG of the host, prevented atrophy of host NG cluster and interneurons, and improved hindlimb placement. The other class, derived from cultures of E14 fetal spinal cord astrocytes, migrated to the NG of the host, failed to maintain the size of cluster neurons and interneurons of the host NG, and resulted in a greater hindlimb placement deficit when compared to controls. These data suggest that improvement of hindlimb placement due to graft-derived fetal astrocytes in injured host spinal cord was due to the ability of the astrocytes to maintain host neurons and neuronal networks.
Keywords: Spinal cord, Transplant, Astrocyte, Neuronal rescue, Return of function
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-1991-245615
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 2, no. 4-6, pp. 261-270, 1991
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]