Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Vallence, Ann-Maree | Reilly, Karen; | Hammond, Geoff
Affiliations: School of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, WA, Australia | INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, ImpAct Team, Lyon, France | University of Lyon 1, Lyon, France
Note: [] This work was completed at the School of Psychology, The University of Western Australia. Corresponding author: Ann-Maree Vallence, School of Psychology (M304), University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Tel.: +61 8 6488 3719; Fax: +61 8 6488 1006; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Purpose: The primary motor cortex is capable of rapid, reversible plastic changes and longer-term, more permanent reorganization. Ischemic nerve block (INB) is a model of deafferentation-induced short-term plasticity. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to examine whether changes in the excitability of short- and/or long-interval intracortical inhibitory (SICI, LICI) or short-interval intracortical facilitatory (SICF) circuits underlie the corticospinal excitability increases observed during INB. Methods: SICI and LICI recruitment curves, obtained by varying conditioning stimulus intensity, and SICF were measured at multiple inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs). Results: Forearm flexor MEP amplitude increased during INB at the wrist; this was not accompanied by changes in SICI at ISIs of 1 or 2 ms, in SICF at ISIs of 1.2, 2.7, or 4.4 ms, or in LICI at an ISI of 80 ms, but was accompanied by an increase in LICI at an ISI of 150 ms. Conclusions: The results suggest that (1) the increased excitability of forearm flexors is not due to reduced SICI or LICI or increased SICF, and (2) LICI measured at ISIs of 80 and 150 ms are distinct processes. We discuss the importance of identifying distinct processes of LICI and speculate regarding other mechanisms that could potentially underlie INB-induced plasticity.
Keywords: Ischemic nerve block, transcranial magnetic stimulation, short-interval intracortical inhibition, long-interval intracortical inhibition, short-interval intracortical facilitation, primary motor cortex, cortical plasticity
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2012-110198
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 345-354, 2012
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]