Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Minnich, Jennie E. | Mann, Sarah L. | Stock, Megan | Stolzenbach, Kathryn A. | Mortell, Bridget M. | Soderstrom, Katherine E. | Bohn, Martha C. | Kozlowski, Dorothy A.
Affiliations: Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA | Department of Pediatrics, Children's Memorial Research Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
Note: [] Corresponding author: Dorothy Kozlowski Ph.D., Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, 2325 N. Clifton, Chicago, IL 60614, USA. Tel.: +1 773 325 2191; Fax: +1 773 325 7596; E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: Purpose: The therapeutic potential of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) gene delivery was examined in a rodent model of traumatic brain injury (TBI), the controlled cortical impact (CCI). Methods: An adenoviral vector harboring human GDNF (AdGDNF) or green fluorescent protein (AdGFP) was injected unilaterally into the forelimb sensorimotor cortex (FL-SMC) of the rat one week prior to a unilateral CCI. Tests of forelimb function and asymmetry were administered for 2 weeks post-injury. At 2 weeks post-injury, animals were sacrificed and contusion size, neuronal survival, neurodegeneration, and virally-mediated GDNF and GFP protein expression were measured. Results: Rats injected with AdGDNF had significantly smaller contusions, more surviving neurons, and less neurodegeneration than AdGFP injected and uninjected injured animals. GDNF gene delivery also resulted in significantly faster recovery of forelimb coordination and a smaller initial preference for the uninjured forelimb during exploration of the walls of a platform. However, overall recovery of symmetrical forelimb use was not achieved. Conclusions: The discrepancy between neural protection and behavioral recovery suggests that while GDNF gene delivery provided a high degree of protection of damaged cortical neurons in this model of TBI, it may not have fully protected their terminals and synaptic functioning, resulting in only mild protection against behavioral deficits.
Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, growth factors, behavioral assessments, forelimb sensorimotor cortex, controlled cortical impact
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2010-0528
Journal: Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 293-309, 2010
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
[email protected]
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office [email protected]
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
[email protected]
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to [email protected]
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: [email protected]